外国文学的“新”与“旧”:新文科浪潮下的思考

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2022.02.002

当代外语研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (2): 13-22.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2022.02.002

外国文学的“新”与“旧”:新文科浪潮下的思考

殷企平()

杭州师范大学,杭州,311121

出版日期:2022-04-28 发布日期:2022-03-28
作者简介:殷企平,杭州师范大学外语学院资深教授。主要研究方向为英国文学。电子邮箱: qipyin@hotmail.com
基金资助:
浙江省哲学社会科学重点研究基地“文艺批评研究院”资助项目(wypp2020001)

The “New” and “Old” in Foreign Literatures: Reflections on the Waves of the New Humanities

YIN Qiping()

Online:2022-04-28 Published:2022-03-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

“新文科”的含义究竟是什么?怎样考量“新”的价值?“新文科”讲求一个“跨”字,那么何为“跨”?怎么“跨”?我们认为,基于上述这些问题来探讨“新文科”的由来及其走向,将会得到一些宝贵的启示。从18世纪英国文人的共识,到英国著名的“两种文化”之争,再到伊格尔顿关于“新”与“旧”的真知灼见,我们可以看到一条有助于反思“新文科”浪潮的历史脉络。如果承认“新文科”这一命名中潜藏着暗礁险滩,那么我们或许能达成一个共识,即愉悦是“跨越”之道。

关键词: 新文科, 含义, 价值考量, 愉悦, “跨越”之道

Abstract:

What are the implications of “the new humanities”? How should we evaluate novelty? What is implied by the word “cross” when we talk about “the new humanities”, which emphasizes crossing various boundaries of academic disciplines. In what way can “crossovers” be materialized? Invaluable inspirations can be drawn if we approach the origin and trend of “the new humanities” by inquiring into the above-mentioned questions. A clear line of history, which will help us reflect on the waves of “the new humanities”, can be traced from the consensus among the 18th century British literati through “the two cultures” to Terry Eagleton’s incisive judgment regarding the “new” and “old”. If we perceive the shoals and reefs hidden in the naming of “the new humanities”, we can perhaps reach a consensus, namely the recognition of pleasure as the way to “cross”.

Key words: the new humanities, implications, evaluation, pleasure, the way to “cross”

中图分类号:

I0-05

殷企平. 外国文学的“新”与“旧”:新文科浪潮下的思考[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 22(2): 13-22.

YIN Qiping. The “New” and “Old” in Foreign Literatures: Reflections on the Waves of the New Humanities[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(2): 13-22.

图/表 1

参考文献 18

[1]	Alter R. 2004. Introduction [A]. In F. Kermode. Pleasure and Change [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 3-14.
[2]	Ashby E. 1966. Technology and the Academics [M]. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
[3]	Barnett R. 1990. The Idea of Higher Education [M]. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
[4]	Eagleton T. 2013. How to Read Literature [M]. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
[5]	Fuery P. & N. Mansfield. 1997. Cultural Studies and New Humanities: Concepts and Controversies [M]. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
[6]	Gigante D. 2010. Foreword [A]. In T. H. Schmid & M. Faubert (eds.). Romanticism and Pleasure [C]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ix-xv.
[7]	Leavis F. R. 1962. Two Cultures? The Significance of C. P. Snow[M]. London: Chatto & Windus.
[8]	Shakespeare W. 1987. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar [A]. In S. Wells & G. Taylor (eds.). The Complete Oxford Shakespeare [C]. New York: Oxford University Press. 1089-1119.
[9]	Shakespeare W. 1987. The History of Henry the Fourth (I Henry Fourth) [A]. In S. Wells & G. Taylor (eds.). The Complete Oxford Shakespeare [C]. New York: Oxford University Press. 263-295.
[10]	Shelley P. B. 2002. Shelley’s Poetry and Prose[M]. New York: W.W. Norton.
[11]	Snow C. P. 1959. The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[12]	Snow C. P. 1964. The Two Cultures and a Second Look [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[13]	Stone, Donald. 1997. Communications with the Future: Matthew Arnold in Dialogue [M]. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
[14]	Trilling L. 1963. The fate of pleasure: Wordsworth to Dostoevsky [A]. In N. Frye (ed.). Romanticism Reconsidered: Selected Papers from the English Institute [C]. New York: Columbia University Press. 73-106.
[15]	金衡山. 2021. 外国文学研究的跨学科方式及其缘由——从美国文学研究谈起[J]. 四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)(6):83-92.
[16]	王铭玉、张涛. 2019. 高校“新文科”建设:概念与行动[J]. 中国社会科学报(3-21):004.
[17]	殷企平. 1995. 英国高等科技教育[M]. 杭州: 杭州大学出版社.
[18]	殷企平、陈姝波. 2002. 为英语“文学道路”正名[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)(6):102-107.

外国文学的“新”与“旧”:新文科浪潮下的思考

The “New” and “Old” in Foreign Literatures: Reflections on the Waves of the New Humanities

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 1

参考文献 18

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宋炳辉. 比较文学专业期刊如何因应新文科建设[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 22(3): 5-11.
[2]	张延飞, 刘洪东. 新文科背景下语言界面研究瓶颈的解决路径[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 22(1): 103-110.
[3]	吕洪灵. 新文科背景下外国文学国别与区域研究的融合[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 22(1): 122-129.
[4]	苗兴伟. 新文科背景下师范类院校外语专业人才培养体系建设[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 21(4): 72-81.
[5]	屈文生. 新文科理念下的新时代高等外语教育意象——以“大外语”等命题为中心[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 21(4): 82-91.
[6]	常辉. 新文科背景下上海交通大学英语专业改革与人才培养探索[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 21(4): 92-96.
[7]	纪秀明, 曾春葙. 新文科视域下外语学科改革的几个平衡点与适度性问题[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 21(4): 97-102.
[8]	刘建军. “新文科”还是“新学科”?——兼论新文科视域下的外国文学教学改革[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 21(3): 21-28.
[9]	郭英剑. 新文科与外语专业建设[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 21(3): 29-34.
[10]	郭鸿杰, 张达球, 丁冬. 一体三通,融创合一:新文科背景下财经类高校外语人才培养模式创新[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 21(3): 35-44.
[11]	潘海英, 刘淑玲. 新文科建设背景下大学外语课程创新发展的若干思考[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 21(3): 45-52.
[12]	徐盛桓, 刘倩. 因果蕴涵理论的应用:以含义研究为例——语言学科理论创新探究之四[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 21(3): 5-20.
[13]	曲卫国, 陈流芳. “新文科”到底是怎样的一场教学改革?^①[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 20(1): 14-25.
[14]	徐晓东, 吴诗玉. 语用信息加工的神经机制[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(02): 31-43.
[15]	梅轩. 含义理论视域下的道德断言新解[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017, 17(06): 57-61.