交叉学科视野中的话语/语言分析——第三届“话语分析中山论坛”会议综述①

当代外语研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3): 173-184.

交叉学科视野中的话语/语言分析——第三届“话语分析中山论坛”会议综述^①

牛文培()

广州南方学院,广州,510970/广东外语外贸大学,广州,510420

出版日期:2024-06-28 发布日期:2024-07-01
作者简介:牛文培,广州南方学院外国语学院讲师、广东外语外贸大学西方语言文化学院博士研究生。主要研究方向为词典学研究、语言学、二语习得。电子邮箱:824069186@qq.com

Discourse/Language Analysis: An Interdisciplinary Perspective——A Conference Review of the Third “Sun Yat-Sen Forum on Discourse Analysis”

NIU Wenpei()

Online:2024-06-28 Published:2024-07-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

“话语分析中山论坛”是中山大学语言研究所举办的学术论坛始于2022年,而后每年四月中旬召开。本次第三届“话语分析中山论坛”于2024年4月13至14日在广东外语外贸大学逸林假日酒店成功举办。论坛主题是“交叉学科视野中的话语/语言分析”,19位海内外知名学者围绕该话题做了丰富的主旨发言,包含平行论坛在内,发言涉及文学、哲学、人类学、管理学、计算机科学、人工智能、临床医学、语料库语言学、社会语言学、神经语言学、功能语言学、应用语言学等领域,为与会者带来了内容丰富的学术盛宴,为搭建多学科话语分析平台提供了学术交流机会。

关键词: 话语分析, 交叉学科, 中山论坛

Abstract:

“Sun Yat-Sen Forum on Discourse Analysis” is an academic forum organized by the Language Studies Institute of Sun Yat-Sen University in 2022. It is held each year in mid-April. The third “Sun Yat-Sen Forum on Discourse Analysis” was successfully held from April 13-14, 2024 at Yilin Holiday Hotel of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies. The theme of the forum is: “Discourse/Language Analysis: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective.” Nineteen (19) famous keynote speakers at home and abroad have given a variety of keynote speeches on this topic, including parallel forums, covering literature, philosophy, anthropology, management, computer science, artificial intelligence, clinical medicine, corpus linguistics, sociolinguistics, neurolinguistics, functional linguistics, applied linguistics and other fields, fully demonstrating the practice of discourse analysis in interdisciplinary subjects. This brought a rich academic experience to the participants and provided excellent academic exchange opportunities for building a multi-disciplinary discourse analysis platform.

Key words: Discourse Analysis, Interdisciplinary, Sun Yat-Sen Forum

牛文培. 交叉学科视野中的话语/语言分析——第三届“话语分析中山论坛”会议综述^①[J]. 当代外语研究, 2024, 24(3): 173-184.

NIU Wenpei. Discourse/Language Analysis: An Interdisciplinary Perspective——A Conference Review of the Third “Sun Yat-Sen Forum on Discourse Analysis”[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024, 24(3): 173-184.

参考文献 13

[1]	Chumley, L. H. & N. Harkness. 2013. Introduction: Qualia[J]. Anthropological Theory 13(1-2): 3-11.
[2]	Fairclough, N. 2013. Critical discourse analysis [A]. In M. Handford & J. P. Gee (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis[M]. London: Routledge. 9-20.
[3]	Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power[M]. London & New York: Longman.
[4]	Ferrell, B. R., T. J. Smith, L. Levit, et al. 2014. Improving the quality of cancer care: Implications for palliative care[J]. Journal of Palliative Medicine 17(4):393-399. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0536 pmid: 24548217
[5]	Fowler, R., B. Hodge, G. Kress, et al. 1979. Language and Control[C]. London: Routledge.
[6]	Gal, S. & J. T. Irvine. 2019. Signs of Difference: Language and Ideology in Social Life[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[7]	Halliday, M. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning[M]. London: Amold.
[8]	Halliday, M. 1990. New ways of meaning: The challenge to applied linguistics[J]. Journal of Applied Linguistics 6(13): 7-36.
[9]	Harris, Z. S. 1952. Discourse analysis[J]. Language: Journal of the Linguistic Society of America 28(1): 1-30.
[10]	Moher, D., A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, et al. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement[J]. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 62(10):1006-1012. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 pmid: 19631508
[11]	Nesbitt, C. & G. Plum. 1988. Probabilities in a systemic functional grammar: The clause complex in English [A]. In R. P. Fawcett & D. L. Young (eds.). New Developments in Systemic linguistics 2: Theory & Application[C]. London: Pinter.6-38.
[12]	Phelan, S. 2014. Neoliberalism, Media and the Political[C]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
[13]	杨雪冬. 2022. 政治话语构建——一个初步分析[J]. 中国政治学(4):4-12.

[1]	周陈新, 刘东虹. 中美经贸摩擦新闻的修辞博弈话语分析[J]. 当代外语研究, 2024, 24(1): 113-124.
[2]	孙炬, 赵一. 《同心战“疫”》中家国情怀的多模态话语分析[J]. 当代外语研究, 2023, 23(6): 78-89.
[3]	哈长辰, 黄国文. 生态语言学新思想及其对生态话语分析的启示[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 22(5): 88-96.
[4]	杨伊, 陈昌来. 多模态话语分析:教师话语研究的一种新范式[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 22(4): 144-153.
[5]	匡芳涛, 郭璨, 邹秀佶. 汉语野生动物保护类标语及物性过程的生态话语分析[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 22(1): 111-121.
[6]	邵珊珊, 彭俊. 新冠疫情下基于生态评价视角的中外电商消费者话语分析[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 21(6): 132-143.
[7]	李战子. 新媒体素养:内涵和演变——兼论对功能语言学话语分析的新挑战[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 21(4): 13-20.
[8]	张瑞华, 李顺然. 国内基于语料库的批评话语分析研究综述[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 20(6): 101-110.
[9]	王靓婧, 潘璠. 新一代可视化语料库软件#LancsBox的核心功能和应用前景[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 20(5): 77-90.
[10]	刘运锋. 文体分析的语言学理论和实践基础——《语言、话语、文体: John McH. Sinclair论文选集》评述[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(05): 122-126.
[11]	王琦. “一带一路”英文媒体中的中国企业形象——语料库辅助下的批评话语分析[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(03): 99-113.
[12]	邵斌, 蔡颖莹, 余晓燕. 西方媒体视野中“一带一路”形象的语料库探析[J]. 当代外语研究, 2018, 18(04): 40-48.
[13]	王品. 重生、救赎与共情:语言暴力事件的积极话语分析视角[J]. 当代外语研究, 2018, 18(04): 49-57.
[14]	赵蕊华, 黄国文. 生态语言学研究与和谐话语分析——黄国文教授访谈录[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017, 17(04): 15-18.
[15]	尤泽顺. 语言与社会互动:从语言相对论到批评话语分析[J]. 当代外语研究, 2016, 16(05): 24-31.