Discourse/Language Analysis: An Interdisciplinary Perspective——A Conference Review of the Third “Sun Yat-Sen Forum on Discourse Analysis”

Abstract

Abstract:

“Sun Yat-Sen Forum on Discourse Analysis” is an academic forum organized by the Language Studies Institute of Sun Yat-Sen University in 2022. It is held each year in mid-April. The third “Sun Yat-Sen Forum on Discourse Analysis” was successfully held from April 13-14, 2024 at Yilin Holiday Hotel of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies. The theme of the forum is: “Discourse/Language Analysis: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective.” Nineteen (19) famous keynote speakers at home and abroad have given a variety of keynote speeches on this topic, including parallel forums, covering literature, philosophy, anthropology, management, computer science, artificial intelligence, clinical medicine, corpus linguistics, sociolinguistics, neurolinguistics, functional linguistics, applied linguistics and other fields, fully demonstrating the practice of discourse analysis in interdisciplinary subjects. This brought a rich academic experience to the participants and provided excellent academic exchange opportunities for building a multi-disciplinary discourse analysis platform.

Key words: Discourse Analysis, Interdisciplinary, Sun Yat-Sen Forum

NIU Wenpei. Discourse/Language Analysis: An Interdisciplinary Perspective——A Conference Review of the Third “Sun Yat-Sen Forum on Discourse Analysis”[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024, 24(3): 173-184.

References 13

[1]	Chumley, L. H. & N. Harkness. 2013. Introduction: Qualia[J]. Anthropological Theory 13(1-2): 3-11.
[2]	Fairclough, N. 2013. Critical discourse analysis [A]. In M. Handford & J. P. Gee (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis[M]. London: Routledge. 9-20.
[3]	Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power[M]. London & New York: Longman.
[4]	Ferrell, B. R., T. J. Smith, L. Levit, et al. 2014. Improving the quality of cancer care: Implications for palliative care[J]. Journal of Palliative Medicine 17(4):393-399. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0536 pmid: 24548217
[5]	Fowler, R., B. Hodge, G. Kress, et al. 1979. Language and Control[C]. London: Routledge.
[6]	Gal, S. & J. T. Irvine. 2019. Signs of Difference: Language and Ideology in Social Life[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[7]	Halliday, M. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning[M]. London: Amold.
[8]	Halliday, M. 1990. New ways of meaning: The challenge to applied linguistics[J]. Journal of Applied Linguistics 6(13): 7-36.
[9]	Harris, Z. S. 1952. Discourse analysis[J]. Language: Journal of the Linguistic Society of America 28(1): 1-30.
[10]	Moher, D., A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, et al. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement[J]. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 62(10):1006-1012. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 pmid: 19631508
[11]	Nesbitt, C. & G. Plum. 1988. Probabilities in a systemic functional grammar: The clause complex in English [A]. In R. P. Fawcett & D. L. Young (eds.). New Developments in Systemic linguistics 2: Theory & Application[C]. London: Pinter.6-38.
[12]	Phelan, S. 2014. Neoliberalism, Media and the Political[C]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
[13]	杨雪冬. 2022. 政治话语构建——一个初步分析[J]. 中国政治学(4):4-12.