诊断学理论与实践 ›› 2019, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (03): 329-333.doi: 10.16150/j.1671-2870.2019.03.016
收稿日期:
2019-01-10
出版日期:
2019-06-25
发布日期:
2019-06-25
通讯作者:
沈立松
E-mail:lisongshen@hotmail.com
ZHOU Xinyun, CHEN Hui, SHEN Lisong()
Received:
2019-01-10
Online:
2019-06-25
Published:
2019-06-25
Contact:
SHEN Lisong
E-mail:lisongshen@hotmail.com
摘要:
目的: 寻找血清中对IgG4相关性疾病(IgG4-related disease, IgG4-RD)诊断有临床价值的新型血清学标志物,并探讨其与器官受累间的相关性及对糖皮质激素治疗的反应。方法: 收集本院2015年1月至2019年1月收治的未经治疗的IgG4-RD患者共72例,通过酶联免疫吸附法测定其血清生长分化因子15(growth differentiation factor 15, GDF-15)、CC趋化因子配体2(CC chemokine ligand 2, CCL2)、透明质酸、Ⅲ型胶原氨基末端前肽(amino-terminal propeptide of type Ⅲ procollagen, PⅢNP)和金属蛋白酶-1组织抑制物(tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases, TIMP-1)浓度,并以TIMP-1、PⅢNP、透明质酸浓度为基础计算增强肝纤维化(enhanced liver fibrosis, ELF)评分,评估这些标志物在反映IgG4-RD患者组织纤维化程度及器官受累范围方面的价值。结果: 与50例健康对照者相比,IgG4-RD患者血清中GDF-15、CCL2、透明质酸、PⅢNP和TIMP-1的浓度显著升高,其平均浓度分别为1 121 pg/mL、398 pg/mL、87.2 ng/mL、26.1 ng/mL和211 ng/mL;IgG4-RD患者的ELF评分也明显升高(11.2分)。其中,GDF-15取临界值为666 pg/mL时,在区分健康对照者与IgG4-RD患者上的能力最为显著(曲线下面积0.92,灵敏度77.8%,特异度100%)。13例患者接受糖皮质激素治疗后行影像学检查均表现出受累器官的好转迹象,其血清IgG4浓度均出现了下降,中位浓度为91 mg/dL(P=0.000 5),但其血清GDF-15、CCL2、TIMP-1浓度却出现了上升。结论: 新型血清纤维化标志物GDF-15对IgG4-RD的诊断有较好的临床价值,但其不能反映IgG4-RD患者器官受累的范围和数目,也不能作为糖皮质激素治疗后疾病转归的观察指标。
中图分类号:
周鑫昀, 陈惠, 沈立松. 新型血清纤维化标志物在IgG4相关性疾病诊断评价中的临床价值[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019, 18(03): 329-333.
ZHOU Xinyun, CHEN Hui, SHEN Lisong. Value of new-type serum fibrosis-related biomarkers level in diagnosing IgG4-related disease[J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2019, 18(03): 329-333.
表2
IgG4-RD患者与健康对照者血清纤维化标志物比较[中位数(四分位数间距)]
指标 | IgG4-RD(n=72) | 健康对照组(n=50) | P值 |
---|---|---|---|
GDF-15(pg/mL) | 1 121(645~2033) | 286(133~325) | <0.000 1 |
CCL2(pg/mL) | 398(231~475) | 309(207~350) | 0.014 0 |
TIMP-1(ng/mL) | 211(138~279) | 135(103~159) | <0.000 1 |
HA(ng/mL) | 87.2(46.3~132) | 20.9(10.8~41.7) | <0.000 1 |
PⅢNP(ng/mL) | 26.1(13.6~50.1) | 5.2(0.7~19.9) | <0.000 1 |
ELF评分 (分) | 11.2(8.8~13.9) | 6.6(4.1~8.9) | <0.000 1 |
表4
IgG4-RD患者糖皮质激素治疗后各标志物的变化情况[中位数(四分位数间距)]
参数 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|
IgG4(mg/dL) | 248(191~504) | 91(59~163) | 0.000 5 |
GDF-15(pg/mL) | 989(571~1537) | 1 158(872~1743) | 0.034 0 |
CCL2(pg/mL) | 310(248~392) | 359(297~434) | 0.033 0 |
TIMP-1(ng/mL) | 220(172~245) | 246(207~280) | 0.019 0 |
HA(ng/mL) | 70.6(51.4~86.6) | 70.8(55.4~91.0) | 0.970 0 |
PⅢNP(ng/mL) | 20.4(5.7~76.8) | 35.6(28.2~57.4) | 0.860 0 |
ELF评分 | 10.3(9.4~10.9) | 10.8(10.5~11.4) | 0.250 0 |
[1] |
Kamisawa T, Zen Y, Pillai S, et al. IgG4-related disease[J]. Lancet, 2015, 385(9976):1460-1471.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60720-0 pmid: 25481618 |
[2] |
Wallace ZS, Deshpande V, Mattoo H, et al. IgG4-Related Disease: Clinical and Laboratory Features in One Hundred Twenty-Five Patients[J]. Arthritis Rheumatol, 2015, 67(9):2466-2475.
doi: 10.1002/art.39205 URL |
[3] |
Ohta N, Kurakami K, Ishida A, et al. Roles of TGF-beta and periostin in fibrosclerosis in patients with IgG4-rela-ted diseases[J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2013, 133(12):1322-1327.
doi: 10.3109/00016489.2013.831187 URL |
[4] |
Tanaka A, Moriyama M, Nakashima H, et al. Th2 and regulatory immune reactions contribute to IgG4 production and the initiation of Mikulicz disease[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 2012, 64(1):254-263.
doi: 10.1002/art.33320 URL |
[5] |
Akiyama M, Yasuoka H, Yoshimoto K, et al. CC-chemokine ligand 18 is a useful biomarker associated with disease activity in IgG4-related disease[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2018, 77(9):1386-1387.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212110 |
[6] |
Parkes J, Roderick P, Harris S, et al. Enhanced liver fibrosis test can predict clinical outcomes in patients with chronic liver disease[J]. Gut, 2010, 59(9):1245-1251.
doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.203166 pmid: 20675693 |
[7] |
Della-Torre E, Feeney E, Deshpande V, et al. B-cell depletion attenuates serological biomarkers of fibrosis and myofibroblast activation in IgG4-related disease[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2015, 74(12):2236-2243.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205799 pmid: 25143523 |
[8] |
Abignano G, Cuomo G, Buch MH, et al. The enhanced liver fibrosis test: a clinical grade, validated serum test, biomarker of overall fibrosis in systemic sclerosis[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2014, 73(2):420-427.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202843 URL |
[9] |
Wu M, Baron M, Pedroza C, et al. CCL2 in the Circulation Predicts Long-Term Progression of Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients With Early Systemic Sclerosis: Data From Two Independent Cohorts[J]. Arthritis Rheumatol, 2017, 69(9):1871-1878.
doi: 10.1002/art.40171 URL |
[10] | Yalçinkaya Y, Çinar S, Artim-Esen B, et al. The relationship between vascular biomarkers and disease characteristics in systemic sclerosis: elevated MCP-1 is predomi-nantly associated with fibrotic manifestations[J]. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 2016, 34 Suppl 100(5):110-114. |
[11] |
Umehara H, Okazaki K, Masaki Y, et al. Comprehensive diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD), 2011[J]. Mod Rheumatol, 2012, 22(1):21-30.
doi: 10.3109/s10165-011-0571-z URL |
[12] |
Umehara H, Okazaki K, Nakamura T, et al. Current approach to the diagnosis of IgG4-related disease - Combination of comprehensive diagnostic and organ-specific criteria[J]. Mod Rheumatol, 2017, 27(3):381-391.
doi: 10.1080/14397595.2017.1290911 URL |
[13] |
Ohara H, Okazaki K, Tsubouchi H, et al. Clinical diagnostic criteria of IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis 2012[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2012, 19(5):536-542.
doi: 10.1007/s00534-012-0521-y URL |
[14] |
Goto H, Takahira M, Azumi A, et al. Diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related ophthalmic disease[J]. Jpn J Ophthalmol, 2015, 59(1):1-7.
doi: 10.1007/s10384-014-0352-2 URL |
[15] |
Matsui S, Yamamoto H, Minamoto S, et al. Proposed diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related respiratory disease[J]. Respir Investig, 2016, 54(2):130-132.
doi: 10.1016/j.resinv.2015.09.002 pmid: 26879484 |
[16] |
Lichtinghagen R, Pietsch D, Bantel H, et al. The Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) score: normal values, influe-nce factors and proposed cut-off values[J]. J Hepatol, 2013, 59(2):236-242.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.03.016 pmid: 23523583 |
[17] |
de Jager SC, Bermúdez B, Bot I, et al. Growth differentiation factor 15 deficiency protects against atherosclerosis by attenuating CCR2-mediated macrophage chemotaxis[J]. J Exp Med, 2011, 208(2):217-225.
doi: 10.1084/jem.20100370 URL |
[18] |
Sierra-Filardi E, Nieto C, Domínguez-Soto A, et al. CCL2 shapes macrophage polarization by GM-CSF and M-CSF: identification of CCL2/CCR2-dependent gene expression profile[J]. J Immunol, 2014, 192(8):3858-3867.
doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302821 pmid: 24639350 |
[19] |
Furukawa S, Moriyama M, Tanaka A, et al. Preferential M2 macrophages contribute to fibrosis in IgG4-related dacryoadenitis and sialoadenitis, so-called Mikulicz's di-sease[J]. Clin Immunol, 2015, 156(1):9-18.
doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2014.10.008 pmid: 25450336 |
[1] | 黄少华, 梁宗辉, 童欢, 管雪妮, 郭瑛, 张雁, 曹宾, 孙育民. 心脏磁共振评估强直性肌营养不良1型患者心肌纤维化的临床价值[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2021, 20(04): 362-367. |
[2] | 肖超, 陶英, 宋陆茜, 赵佑山, 吴凌云, 常春康. 88例骨髓增殖性疾病患者的临床资料分析[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2020, 19(02): 115-121. |
[3] | 夏幼辰, 陆伦根. 2017年美国胃肠病学会《瞬时弹性成像技术在评估肝纤维化中的应用指南》的解读[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2018, 17(01): 25-31. |
[4] | 李慧凛, 吴萍, 刘爽, 蒋更如. 可溶性Klotho蛋白抑制高糖诱导的STAT3磷酸化通路减轻肾纤维化[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2017, 16(04): 371-376. |
[5] | 张清清, 陆伦根,. miRNA诊断慢性肝病及肝纤维化价值的研究进展[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2015, 14(04): 367-370. |
[6] | 朱乃懿, 周惠娟, 郭斯敏, 黄蔚, 缪飞, 黄娟, 张勇, 冉荣侃, 柴维敏,. 肝纤维化磁共振扩散相关成像与病理学结果关系的对照研究[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2015, 14(01): 41-45. |
[7] | 曲颖, 陆伦根,. 脂肪性肝病与肝纤维化的诊治现状[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2014, 13(02): 116-120. |
[8] | 朱乃懿, 严福华, 王鹤, 侯亮, 罗先富, 张菁, 柴维敏,. MR IDEAL-QUANT及ESWAN成像技术评估肝纤维化铁质沉积的初步研究[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2014, 13(02): 146-151. |
[9] | 柴维敏, 严福华, 王鹤, 侯亮, 罗先富, 张菁, 朱乃懿,. 体素内不规则运动磁共振成像在肝纤维化评估中的初步应用[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2014, 13(01): 77-81. |
[10] | 王怡, 唐蕾, 詹维伟, 陈曼,. 超声造影在兔肝纤维化实质灌注的定量评估[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2013, 12(04): 470-473. |
[11] | 张燕香, 魏蓉,. BCR-ABL阴性的骨髓增殖性肿瘤JAK2基因V617F突变分析[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2013, 12(03): 299-303. |
[12] | 唐蕾, 王怡, 詹维伟, 陈曼,. 肝纤维化灰阶超声造影的临床应用评估[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2013, 12(02): 224-227. |
[13] | 邓伟吾,. 丙型肝炎病毒感染与慢性呼吸道疾病关系的认识[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2011, 10(05): 397-400. |
[14] | 陈瑞珍, 解玉泉,. 病毒性心肌炎向扩张型心肌病演变的免疫学机制[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2011, 10(05): 414-417. |
[15] | 韩宇, 汪登斌, 姜婷婷, 李志, 史曙光,. MRI表观弥散系数值评价大鼠肝纤维化干扰素INFα-2b治疗疗效的研究[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2011, 10(04): 335-339. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||