诊断学理论与实践 ›› 2026, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (02): 174-182.doi: 10.16150/j.1671-2870.2026.02.008
刘小草1,2,3, 曾庆泽4, 李依霞1,2,3, 李凯程4, 罗骁4, 闫少珍1,2,3, 卢洁1,2,3(
)
收稿日期:2025-10-27
修回日期:2026-01-04
接受日期:2026-01-05
出版日期:2026-04-25
发布日期:2026-04-25
通讯作者:
卢洁 E-mail:imaginglu@hotmail.com基金资助:
LIU Xiaocao1,2,3, ZENG Qingze4, LI Yixia1,2,3, LI Kaicheng4, LUO Xiao4, YAN Shaozhen1,2,3, LU Jie1,2,3(
)
Received:2025-10-27
Revised:2026-01-04
Accepted:2026-01-05
Published:2026-04-25
Online:2026-04-25
摘要:
目的:基于磁共振成像(magnetic resonance imaging,MRI),探讨Klotho基因中KL-VS功能型单倍型杂合基因(KL-VShet)对阿尔茨海默病(Alzheimer’s disease,AD)进展中最早发生异常的脑区内侧颞叶亚区结构的影响,及其与AD病理相关认知功能下降的关系。方法:纳入AD神经影像学计划数据库中的48名受试者(2018年10月至2024年6月间,均具有全基因组关联分析数据及高分辨率磁共振数据),其中16人为KL-VShet携带者(KL-VShet+)[8名认知功能正常,8名存在记忆性轻度认知障碍(mild cognitive impairment,MCI)];32名为非携带者KL-VShet-(16名认知功能正常,16名存在MCI)。采用海马亚区自动分割软件,分析结构MRI数据,计算内侧颞叶亚区体积;利用方差分析比较组间内侧颞叶亚区体积、认知功能及病理蛋白[β-淀粉样蛋白(amyloid β-protein,Aβ)/tau蛋白]差异,并使用SPSS 27(PROCESS v4.1)软件进行交互调节效应分析。结果:KL-VShet+者与KL-VShet-者的内侧颞叶亚区体积、认知功能及病理蛋白(Aβ/tau蛋白)负荷存在显著差异(P<0.05)。MCI组,KL-VShet+的左侧海马亚区阿蒙氏角(cornu Ammonis,CA)3(79.80±29.75 mm3)及齿状回(755.19±186.68 mm3)体积较KL-VShet-(52.46±15.53 mm3、710.09±146.09 mm3)显著增大(P<0.05);KL-VShet +者的tau蛋白沉积较KL-VShet-者显著减低(P<0.05),Aβ蛋白沉积有更低的趋势,但未发现具有统计学差异(P=0.054)。交互调节分析显示,在KL-VShet+者中,多个内侧颞叶亚区体积对AD相关病理与认知表现之间的关联具有显著正向调节作用,且该效应主要体现在记忆评分。其中,左侧 CA3 区域体积对于 Aβ蛋白沉积与记忆功能评分之间关系、双侧多个内侧颞叶亚区体积对tau 蛋白沉积与记忆评分之间的关系表现出显著调节作用(交互项β范围为0.000 5~0.074 5,95%置信区间为-0.002 0~0.172 3,P<0.05)。结论:KL-VShet+基因产物可能通过减缓海马等内侧颞叶区域体积萎缩,减轻MCI患者病理蛋白沉积对认知功能的损害,从而发挥神经保护作用。KL-VShet可能作为AD治疗的新靶点。
中图分类号:
刘小草, 曾庆泽, 李依霞, 李凯程, 罗骁, 闫少珍, 卢洁. KL-VS基因对轻度认知障碍患者内侧颞叶体积影响的磁共振研究[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2026, 25(02): 174-182.
LIU Xiaocao, ZENG Qingze, LI Yixia, LI Kaicheng, LUO Xiao, YAN Shaozhen, LU Jie. The effect of KL-VS gene on medial temporal lobe volume in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A study based on MRI[J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2026, 25(02): 174-182.
表1
KL-VShet+及KL-VShet-一般资料、PET病理标志物比较($\bar{x}±s$)
| Item | KL-VShet-CN | KL-VShet-MCI | KL-VShet+CN | KL-VShet+MCI | F(χ2) | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 16 | 16 | 8 | 8 | / | / |
| Age(years) | 76.36±3.99 | 74.44±7.49 | 76.05±5.17 | 78.36±6.40 | 0.775 | 0.514 |
| Female [N (%)] | 2(12.5) | 9(56.25) | 4(50) | 1(12.5) | / | 0.024 |
| APOE ε4 carrier [N (%)] | 6(60) | 8(50) | 4(50) | 3(37.5) | / | 0.536 |
| Education(years) | 17.88±2.09 | 16.94±2.32 | 17.63±2.13 | 17.29±2.20 | 0.913 | 0.443 |
| MMSE (total) | 28.94±1.12 | 26.25±4.48 | 29.63±1.06 | 27.13±2.23 | 3.611 | 0.02a,d |
| MoCA (total) | 25.19±2.81 | 21.94±3.80 | 24.63±2.88 | 22.88±2.99 | 3.123 | 0.035a |
| Memory function (z-score) | 0.49±0.33 | 0.03±0.56 | 0.73±0.57 | 0.29±0.35 | 5.035 | 0.001a,c,d,f |
| Executive function (z-score) | 0.70±0.37 | 0.34±0.75 | 0.75±0.45 | 0.45±0.55 | 1.554 | 0.214 |
| Language function (z-score) | 0.45±0.33 | 0.34±0.65 | 0.76±0.41 | 0.20±0.48 | 1.956 | 0.135f |
| Aβ PET centiloid unit | 27.85±28.43(16) | 70.90±54.53(15) | 42.59±44.49(7) | 41.05±66.23(7) | 2.200 | 0.103a |
| tau Braak Ⅰ-Ⅱ SUVR(N) | 1.18±0.21(14) | 1.45±0.27(15) | 1.13±0.08(6) | 1.15±0.13(7) | 5.946 | 0.002a,d,e |
| tau Braak Ⅲ-Ⅳ SUVR(N) | 1.17±0.17(14) | 1.31±0.27(15) | 1.13±0.03(6) | 1.12±0.16(6) | 2.096 | 0.117 |
| tau Braak Ⅴ-Ⅵ SUVR(N) | 1.05±0.10(14) | 1.17±0.20(15) | 1.05±0.06(6) | 1.01±0.15(6) | 2.63 | 0.64a,e |
| tau META TEMporal SUVR(N) | 1.22±0.24(14) | 1.42±0.35(15) | 1.18±0.02(6) | 1.19±0.18(6) | 2.106 | 0.116 |
表2
KL-VShet+及KL-VShet-内侧颞叶亚区体积比较($\bar{x}±s$)
| Item | KL-VShet-CN | KL-VShet-MCI | KL-VShet+CN | KL-VShet+MCI | F(χ2) | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L_CA1 | 1287.70±114.45 | 1191.64±211.91 | 1324.33±200.95 | 1118.70±208.09 | 2.303 | 0.091c,f |
| L_CA2 | 1.57±1.26 | 1.11±0.61 | 1.53±1.21 | 0.74±0.46 | 1.275 | 0.300 |
| L_CA3 | 56.37±16.37 | 52.46±15.53 | 56.88±20.81 | 72.80±29.75 | 1.799 | 0.162e |
| L_DG | 782.93±68.93 | 710.09±146.09 | 797.66±98.31 | 755.19±186.68 | 1.234 | 0.309c,e |
| L_SUB | 447.20±83.46 | 403.47±52.35 | 447.50±87.31 | 382.98±69.07 | 1.959 | 0.135 |
| L_ERC | 456.30±66.04 | 369.30±79.03 | 398.13±101.39 | 387.99±128.81 | 2.671 | 0.060 |
| L_BA35 | 531.47±89.16 | 472.24±92.27 | 496.34±117.24 | 452.86±90.28 | 1.475 | 0.235 |
| L_BA36 | 1824.36±305.82 | 1605.57±266.88 | 1655.54±295.64 | 1599.68±448.21 | 1.502 | 0.228 |
| L_PHC | 757.33±165.20 | 722.16±164.32 | 713.10±140.74 | 693.08±143.82 | 0.317 | 0.813 |
| L_CA | 1346.21±123.47 | 1245.00±220.02 | 1382.17±192.91 | 1148.32±244.44 | 2.717 | 0.056c,f |
| L_HIPP | 2129.15±150.98 | 1955.09±358.11 | 2179.83±261.27 | 1859.12±441.02 | 2.283 | 0.093f |
| R_CA1 | 1173.77±119.59 | 1158.21±230.51 | 1266.84±162.16 | 1118.00±267.69 | 0.823 | 0.489 |
| R_CA2 | 7.84±3.27 | 8.19±4.12 | 9.38±2.72 | 6.68±1.04 | 0.778 | 0.513 |
| R_CA3 | 62.04±27.89 | 56.02±16.18 | 65.20±26.54 | 72.71±38.17 | 0.716 | 0.548 |
| R_DG | 792.12±99.14 | 788.20±165.25 | 852.15±73.66 | 751.24±140.99 | 0.803 | 0.499 |
| R_SUB | 443.26±85.09 | 434.48±75.11 | 477.25±80.70 | 387.62±48.23 | 1.750 | 0.171f |
| R_ERC | 491.23±102.61 | 415.65±98.74 | 433.40±101.50 | 464.73±167.08 | 1.262 | 0.300 |
| R_BA35 | 512.29±101.25 | 487.86±87.79 | 483.05±65.29 | 437.77±152.33 | 0.873 | 0.463 |
| R_BA36 | 1805.15±450.28 | 1574.03±250.67 | 1752.69±267.92 | 1591.25±510.68 | 1.225 | 0.313 |
| R_PHC | 774.14±126.18 | 787.02±125.03 | 759.42±110.75 | 764.08±283.94 | 0.069 | 0.976 |
| R_CA | 1243.64±136.95 | 1222.42±242.02 | 1341.42±154.19 | 1157.59±296.30 | 1.065 | 0.378 |
| R_HIPP | 2035.76±204.99 | 2010.62±400.06 | 2193.57±213.55 | 1882.69±430.93 | 1.225 | 0.312 |
图3
影像学指标、认知表现、病理相关性分析图 注:表格内数值为Pearson相关系数(The values in the table represent Pearson correlation coefficients). *:P<0.05,**:P<0.01;MEM:记忆功能(memory function);EXF:执行功能(executive function);LAN:语言功能(language function);VSP:视空间评分(visual Spatial Score);MMSE:简易精神状态量表(mini-mental state examination);MoCA:蒙特利尔认知评估量表(Montreal cognitive assessment);CA:阿蒙氏角(cornu Ammonis);DG:齿状回(dentate gyrus);Sub:下托(subiculum);ERC:内嗅皮层(entorhinal cortex);PHC:海马旁回(Parahippocampal gyrus);HIPP:海马(Hippocampus);BA:布罗德曼分区(Brodmann area);L:左侧(left);R:右侧(right);MCI:轻度认知障碍(mild cognitive impairment);CN:认知正常(cognitively normal)。
表3
交互调节效应
| Subre- gions | Independent variable | Dependent variable | β(subregions× pathology× KL-VS) | SE | t | P | LLCI | ULCI | ∆R2 | KL-VShet- | KL-VShet+ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | P | β | P | ||||||||||
| L_CA3 | Aβ-CL | MEM | 0.0005 | 0.000 2 | 2.710 0 | 0.010 3 | 0.000 1 | 0.000 8 | 0.112 9 | -0.000 1 | 0.702 3 | 0.000 4 | 0.001 0 |
| L_CA3 | Aβ-CL | MoCA | 0.002 5 | 0.001 2 | 2.033 1 | 0.049 7 | 0.000 0 | 0.005 0 | 0.076 0 | -0.001 0 | 0.272 1 | 0.001 5 | 0.082 0 |
| L_DG | tau Braak Ⅲ-Ⅳ SUVR | MEM | 0.028 1 | 0.009 5 | 2.974 6 | 0.005 5 | 0.008 9 | 0.047 4 | 0.120 4 | -0.004 9 | 0.179 7 | 0.023 3 | 0.012 3 |
| L_ERC | tau Braak Ⅲ-Ⅳ SUVR | MEM | 0.026 5 | 0.012 4 | 2.142 7 | 0.039 8 | 0.001 3 | 0.051 7 | 0.056 1 | -0.004 5 | 0.276 3 | 0.022 0 | 0.068 8 |
| L_PHC | tau Braak Ⅲ-Ⅳ SUVR | MEM | 0.034 1 | 0.017 7 | 1.923 5 | 0.063 3 | -0.002 0 | 0.070 2 | 0.062 5 | -0.000 8 | 0.080 4 | 0.033 3 | 0.065 4 |
| R_CA1 | tau Braak Ⅲ-Ⅳ SUVR | MEM | 0.019 1 | 0.008 4 | 2.260 5 | 0.030 7 | 0.001 9 | 0.036 3 | 0.082 9 | -0.003 3 | 0.168 6 | 0.015 8 | 0.060 6 |
| R_DG | tau Braak Ⅲ-Ⅳ SUVR | MEM | 0.038 5 | 0.014 9 | 2.587 5 | 0.014 4 | 0.008 2 | 0.068 8 | 0.099 9 | -0.005 6 | 0.039 6 | 0.032 9 | 0.031 9 |
| R_SUB | tau Braak Ⅲ-Ⅳ SUVR | MEM | 0.087 3 | 0.041 7 | 2.091 4 | 0.044 5 | 0.002 3 | 0.172 3 | 0.073 9 | -0.003 9 | 0.606 0 | 0.083 4 | 0.050 7 |
| R_BA35 | tau Braak Ⅲ-Ⅳ SUVR | MEM | 0.038 1 | 0.014 3 | 2.670 4 | 0.011 8 | 0.009 0 | 0.067 2 | 0.110 4 | -0.012 0 | 0.084 3 | 0.026 1 | 0.046 2 |
| L_DG | tau meta temporal SUVR | MEM | 0.018 8 | 0.007 7 | 2.435 0 | 0.020 6 | 0.003 1 | 0.034 5 | 0.083 3 | -0.003 1 | 0.275 5 | 0.015 7 | 0.036 6 |
| R_DG | tau meta temporal SUVR | MEM | 0.026 4 | 0.012 5 | 2.123 2 | 0.041 6 | 0.001 1 | 0.051 8 | 0.070 0 | -0.004 0 | 0.067 3 | 0.022 5 | 0.076 5 |
| R_BA35 | tau meta temporal SUVR | MEM | 0.031 2 | 0.126 0 | 2.471 2 | 0.019 0 | 0.005 5 | 0.056 8 | 0.095 1 | -0.007 5 | 0.169 0 | 0.023 7 | 0.046 5 |
| L_CA1 | tau Braak Ⅴ-Ⅵ SUVR | MEM | 0.016 3 | 0.006 7 | 2.440 9 | 0.020 4 | 0.002 7 | 0.029 9 | 0.077 6 | -0.004 4 | 0.206 7 | 0.011 9 | 0.046 3 |
| L_DG | tau Braak Ⅴ-Ⅵ SUVR | MEM | 0.028 1 | 0.007 9 | 3.535 9 | 0.001 3 | 0.011 9 | 0.044 2 | 0.160 5 | -0.007 7 | 0.072 7 | 0.020 4 | 0.005 1 |
| L_Sub | tau Braak Ⅴ-Ⅵ SUVR | MEM | 0.052 7 | 0.023 0 | 2.295 6 | 0.028 4 | 0.005 9 | 0.099 5 | 0.076 4 | -0.009 8 | 0.408 5 | 0.042 9 | 0.037 3 |
| L_ERC | tau Braak Ⅴ-Ⅵ SUVR | MEM | 0.034 1 | 0.011 0 | 3.095 2 | 0.004 1 | 0.011 6 | 0.056 5 | 0.109 0 | -0.010 0 | 0.134 2 | 0.024 0 | 0.010 6 |
| L_PHC | tau Braak Ⅴ-Ⅵ SUVR | MEM | 0.035 2 | 0.016 3 | 2.152 6 | 0.039 0 | 0.001 9 | 0.068 4 | 0.079 7 | -0.002 9 | 0.537 6 | 0.032 2 | 0.047 6 |
| R_CA1 | tau Braak Ⅴ-Ⅵ SUVR | MEM | 0.016 8 | 0.006 9 | 2.432 6 | 0.020 8 | 0.002 7 | 0.030 8 | 0.093 1 | -0.002 6 | 0.315 0 | 0.014 2 | 0.034 2 |
| R_DG | tau Braak Ⅴ-Ⅵ SUVR | MEM | 0.032 9 | 0.010 5 | 3.115 2 | 0.003 9 | 0.011 4 | 0.054 3 | 0.138 6 | -0.005 0 | 0.089 9 | 0.027 9 | 0.009 9 |
| R_SUB | tau Braak Ⅴ-Ⅵ SUVR | MEM | 0.074 5 | 0.029 1 | 2.558 8 | 0.015 4 | 0.015 2 | 0.133 9 | 0.105 4 | -0.008 3 | 0.353 2 | 0.066 2 | 0.023 2 |
| R_ERC | tau Braak Ⅴ-Ⅵ SUVR | MEM | 0.0280 | 0.012 2 | 2.287 0 | 0.029 0 | 0.003 1 | 0.052 8 | 0.084 7 | -0.006 9 | 0.306 6 | 0.021 0 | 0.048 4 |
| R_BA35 | tau Braak Ⅴ-Ⅵ SUVR | MEM | 0.039 3 | 0.012 1 | 3.257 5 | 0.002 7 | 0.014 7 | 0.063 9 | 0.148 7 | -0.009 8 | 0.178 3 | 0.029 5 | 0.004 8 |
| R_BA36 | tau Braak Ⅴ-Ⅵ SUVR | MEM | 0.010 9 | 0.004 5 | 2.430 5 | 0.020 9 | 0.001 8 | 0.020 0 | 0.100 4 | -0.002 2 | 0.348 7 | 0.008 7 | 0.030 8 |
| R_HIPP | tau Braak Ⅴ-Ⅵ SUVR | MEM | 0.009 5 | 0.004 2 | 2.285 3 | 0.028 9 | 0.001 0 | 0.018 0 | 0.079 1 | -0.001 8 | 0.193 9 | 0.007 7 | 0.058 9 |
| [1] |
2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures[J]. Alzheimers Dement, 2023, 19(4):1598-1695.
doi: 10.1002/alz.13016 pmid: 36918389 |
| [2] |
DUBAL D B, YOKOYAMA J S, ZHU L, et al. Life extension factor klotho enhances cognition[J]. Cell Rep, 2014, 7(4):1065-1076.
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.03.076 pmid: 24813892 |
| [3] |
LEON J, MORENO A J, GARAY B I, et al. Peripheral elevation of a klotho fragment enhances brain function and resilience in young, aging, and α-synuclein transgenic mice[J]. Cell Rep, 2017, 20(6):1360-1371.
doi: S2211-1247(17)30990-7 pmid: 28793260 |
| [4] |
LATHE R, ST CLAIR D. Programmed ageing: decline of stem cell renewal, immunosenescence, and Alzheimer's disease[J]. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc, 2023, 98(4):1424-1458.
doi: 10.1111/brv.12959 pmid: 37068798 |
| [5] |
WALCZAK K, KOŁODZIEJCZYK W, PSZCZOŁOWSKA M, et al. Klotho protein in Alzheimer's disease: Diet leading to immortality?[J]. J Alzheimers Dis, 2025, 106(3):823-831.
doi: 10.1177/13872877251350125 pmid: 40598860 |
| [6] | ABRAHAM C R, MULLEN P C, TUCKER-ZHOU T, et al. Klotho is a neuroprotective and cognition-enhancing protein[J]. Vitam Horm, 2016,101:215-238. |
| [7] |
BELLOY M E, NAPOLIONI V, HAN S S, et al. Association of KLOTHO-VS heterozygosity with risk of Alzheimer disease in individuals who carry APOE4[J]. JAMA Neurol, 2020, 77(7):849-862.
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0414 pmid: 32282020 |
| [8] | ERICKSON C M, SCHULTZ S A, OH J M, et al. KLOTHO heterozygosity attenuates APOE4-related amyloid burden in preclinical AD[J]. Neurology, 2019, 92(16):e1878-e1889. |
| [9] |
KATONOVA A, ANDEL R, JURASOVA V, et al. Associations of KLOTHO-VS heterozygosity and α-klotho protein with cerebrospinal fluid Alzheimer's disease biomarkers[J]. J Alzheimers Dis, 2025, 105(1):159-171.
doi: 10.1177/13872877251326199 URL |
| [10] |
CHEN X R, SHAO Y, SADOWSKI M J, et al. Interaction between KLOTHO-VS heterozygosity and APOE ε4 allele predicts rate of cognitive decline in late-onset Alzheimer's disease[J]. Genes (Basel), 2023, 14(4):917.
doi: 10.3390/genes14040917 URL |
| [11] |
SORRENTINO F, FENOGLIO C, SACCHI L, et al. KLOTHO gene expression is decreased in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with Alzheimer's di-sease and frontotemporal dementia[J]. J Alzheimers Dis, 2023, 94(3):1225-1231.
doi: 10.3233/JAD-230322 URL |
| [12] |
YOKOYAMA J S, MARX G, BROWN J A, et al. Systemic klotho is associated with KLOTHO variation and predicts intrinsic cortical connectivity in healthy human aging[J]. Brain Imaging Behav, 2017, 11(2):391-400.
doi: 10.1007/s11682-016-9598-2 pmid: 27714549 |
| [13] | DE VRIES C F, STAFF R T, HARRIS S E, et al. Klotho, APOEε4, cognitive ability, brain size, atrophy, and survival: a study in the Aberdeen Birth Cohort of 1936[J]. Neurobiol Aging, 2017,55:91-98. |
| [14] |
CAI Y, DU J, LI A, et al. Initial levels of β-amyloid and tau deposition have distinct effects on longitudinal tau accumulation in Alzheimer's disease[J]. Alzheimers Res Ther, 2023, 15(1):30.
doi: 10.1186/s13195-023-01178-w pmid: 36750884 |
| [15] | 李雨航, 肖世富, 岳玲. 轻度行为损害与阿尔茨海默病相关研究的进展[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2025, 24(5):548-554. |
| LI Y H, XIAO S F, YUE L. Advances in research on association between mild behavioral impairment and Alzheimer's disease[J]. J Diagn Concepts Pract, 2025, 24(5):548-554. | |
| [16] |
BERRON D, VAN WESTEN D, OSSENKOPPELE R, et al. Medial temporal lobe connectivity and its associations with cognition in early Alzheimer's disease[J]. Brain, 2020, 143(4):1233-1248.
doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa068 pmid: 32252068 |
| [17] |
HARRISON T M, MAASS A, ADAMS J N, et al. Tau deposition is associated with functional isolation of the hippocampus in aging[J]. Nat Commun, 2019, 10(1):4900.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12921-z pmid: 31653847 |
| [18] |
GORDON B A, BLAZEY T M, SU Y, et al. Spatial patterns of neuroimaging biomarker change in individuals from families with autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease: a longitudinal study[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2018, 17(3):241-250.
doi: S1474-4422(18)30028-0 pmid: 29397305 |
| [19] |
DRISCOLL I F, LOSE S, MA Y, et al. KLOTHO KL-VS heterozygosity is associated with diminished age-related neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration, and synaptic dysfunction in older cognitively unimpaired adults[J]. Alzheimers Dement, 2024, 20(8):5347-5356.
doi: 10.1002/alz.13912 pmid: 39030746 |
| [20] |
JACK C R JR, BENNETT D A, BLENNOW K, et al. NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease[J]. Alzheimers Dement, 2018, 14(4):535-562.
doi: S1552-5260(18)30072-4 pmid: 29653606 |
| [21] |
BRAAK H, ALAFUZOFF I, ARZBERGER T, et al. Sta-ging of Alzheimer disease-associated neurofibrillary patho-logy using paraffin sections and immunocytochemistry[J]. Acta Neuropathol, 2006, 112(4):389-404.
doi: 10.1007/s00401-006-0127-z URL |
| [22] |
GIULIANO A, DONATELLI G, COSOTTINI M, et al. Hippocampal subfields at ultra high field MRI: An overview of segmentation and measurement methods[J]. Hippocampus, 2017, 27(5):481-494.
doi: 10.1002/hipo.22717 pmid: 28188659 |
| [23] |
YOKOYAMA J S, STURM V E, BONHAM L W, et al. Variation in longevity gene KLOTHO is associated with greater cortical volumes[J]. Ann Clin Transl Neurol, 2015, 2(3):215-230.
doi: 10.1002/acn3.161 URL |
| [24] |
ZHAO Y, ZENG C Y, LI X H, et al. Klotho overexpression improves amyloid-β clearance and cognition in the APP/PS1 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease[J]. Aging Cell, 2020, 19(10): e13239.
doi: 10.1111/acel.v19.10 URL |
| [25] |
ULLAH M, SUN Z. Klotho deficiency accelerates stem cells aging by impairing telomerase activity[J]. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2019, 74(9):1396-1407.
doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly261 URL |
| [26] |
ZENG Q, LI K, LUO X, et al. Distinct atrophy pattern of hippocampal subfields in patients with progressive and stable mild cognitive impairment: A longitudinal MRI study[J]. J Alzheimers Dis, 2021, 79(1):237-247.
doi: 10.3233/JAD-200775 pmid: 33252076 |
| [27] |
ROIG-SORIANO J, EDO Á, VERDÉS S, et al. Long-term effects of s-KL treatment in wild-type mice: Enhancing longevity, physical well-being, and neurological resilience[J]. Mol Ther, 2025, 33(8):4007.
doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.06.046 URL |
| [28] |
HUIJBERS W, MORMINO E C, SCHULTZ A P, et al. Amyloid-β deposition in mild cognitive impairment is associated with increased hippocampal activity, atrophy and clinical progression[J]. Brain, 2015, 138(Pt 4):1023-1035.
doi: 10.1093/brain/awv007 pmid: 25678559 |
| [29] | KAZIM S F, SEO J H, BIANCHI R, et al. Neuronal network excitability in Alzheimer's disease: The puzzle of similar versus divergent roles of amyloid β and tau[J]. eNeuro, 2021, 8(2):ENEURO.0418-20.2020. |
| [30] |
KANG D W, CHOI W H, JUNG W S, et al. Impact of amyloid burden on regional functional synchronization in the cognitively normal older adults[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1):14690.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15001-8 pmid: 29089631 |
| [31] |
DAS S R, PLUTA J, MANCUSO L, et al. Increased functional connectivity within medial temporal lobe in mild cognitive impairment[J]. Hippocampus, 2013, 23(1):1-6.
doi: 10.1002/hipo.22051 pmid: 22815064 |
| [32] |
TAHMASIAN M, PASQUINI L, SCHERR M, et al. The lower hippocampus global connectivity, the higher its local metabolism in Alzheimer disease[J]. Neurology, 2015, 84(19):1956-1963.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001575 pmid: 25878180 |
| [33] |
PATTEN K T, VALENZUELA A E, WALLIS C, et al. The effects of chronic exposure to ambient traffic-related air pollution on Alzheimer's disease phenotypes in wildtype and genetically predisposed male and female rats[J]. Environ Health Perspect, 2021, 129(5):57005.
doi: 10.1289/EHP8905 URL |
| [1] | 方珉, 刘静文, 曾媛媛, 金爱萍. 阿尔茨海默病诊断的血液生物标志物进展[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2026, 25(02): 113-120. |
| [2] | 张楠, 卢清正. 不典型阿尔茨海默病的诊断[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2026, 25(02): 121-130. |
| [3] | 支楠, 耿介立, 曹雯炜, 宋雅颖, 王刚. 《抗Aβ单克隆抗体临床应用建议(2025版)》解读[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2026, 25(02): 148-156. |
| [4] | 王佳悦, 熊文魁, 姜玮贇, 王健, 曾乃燕, 岳玲. 空间记忆检测与蒙特利尔认知评估筛查中国老年人群轻度认知障碍的效度比较[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2026, 25(02): 165-173. |
| [5] | 徐陈昊义, 刘静文, 方珉. 阿尔茨海默病采用仑卡奈单抗治疗致淀粉样蛋白相关影像学异常1例报告及风险因素文献复习[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2026, 25(02): 225-231. |
| [6] | 李雨航, 肖世富, 岳玲. 轻度行为损害与阿尔茨海默病相关研究的进展[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2025, 24(05): 548-554. |
| [7] | 赵然, 詹维伟, 李成, 汤海浪, 卜玉莲, 刘坤. 经直肠超声造影联合磁共振成像在中低位直肠癌T分期及治疗决策中的应用价值[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2025, 24(03): 293-300. |
| [8] | 王康宁, 朱兰, 冯威铭, 夏益涵, 石博文, 张欢. 合成磁共振预测局部进展期直肠癌患者行新辅助放化疗疗效的价值[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2025, 24(02): 170-177. |
| [9] | 张慧慧, 方姝, 吴梦雄, 刘方韬, 贺娜英, 董海鹏, 严福华. 深度学习重建技术在改善磁共振冠状位T1WI显示垂体神经内分泌肿瘤图像质量中的研究[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2024, 23(06): 594-601. |
| [10] | 王刚, 齐金蕾, 刘馨雅, 任汝静, 林绍慧, 胡以松, 李海霞, 谢心怡, 王金涛, 李建平, 朱怡康, 高梦伊, 杨竣杰, 王怡然, 井玉荣, 耿介立, 支楠, 曹雯炜, 徐群, 余小萍, 朱圆, 周滢, 王琳, 高超, 李彬寅, 陈生弟, 袁芳, 窦荣花, 刘晓云, 李雪娜, 尹雅芙, 常燕, 徐刚, 辛佳蔚, 钟燕婷, 李春波, 王颖, 周脉耕, 陈晓春, 代表中国阿尔茨海默病报告编写组. 中国阿尔茨海默病报告2024[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2024, 23(03): 219-256. |
| [11] | 查云飞, 武夏夏. MRI深度学习图像重建技术在肌骨系统疾病诊断的应用进展[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2024, 23(02): 114-118. |
| [12] | 高梦, 柴维敏, 严福华. 胰腺囊性肿瘤的CT/MRI诊断进展[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2024, 23(02): 184-191. |
| [13] | 2030脑与类脑计划变性病痴呆多模影像诊断标准及分子影像技术研究课题组, 上海市衰老与退行性疾病学会衰老与认知障碍分会. 痴呆及相关认知障碍的神经影像学诊断专家共识(2023年版)[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2024, 23(01): 30-39. |
| [14] | 李明, 陈克敏, 潘自来, 罗禹. CT及MRI预测急性缺血性脑梗死出血性转化的价值研究进展[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2024, 23(01): 83-89. |
| [15] | 丁景峰, 敖炜群, 朱珍, 孙静, 徐良根, 郑世保, 俞晶晶, 胡金文. 基于T2WI和DWI的磁共振影像组学在术前预测直肠癌壁外血管侵犯的价值研究[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2024, 23(01): 46-56. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||