内科理论与实践 ›› 2022, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (05): 385-389.doi: 10.16138/j.1673-6087.2022.05.007

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情下定点医院轻型急性缺血性卒中患者门诊精简化诊疗临床疗效分析

高彩红   

  1. 北京市门头沟区医院 首都医科大学门头沟教学医院神经内科,北京 102300
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-18 出版日期:2022-09-30 发布日期:2022-11-04
  • 基金资助:
    首都医科大学医院管理研究所开放性课题(2020YGS04)

Analysis of therapeutic efficacy of simplified diagnosis and treatment for outpatients with acute mild ischemic stroke in designated hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic

GAO Caihong   

  1. Departmen of Neurology, Beijing Men Tou Gou District Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing 102300, China
  • Received:2021-09-18 Online:2022-09-30 Published:2022-11-04

摘要:

目的:分析新型冠状病毒(新冠)肺炎疫情防控期间,门诊轻型缺血性卒中患者临床特征及门诊精简化诊疗的有效性。方法:连续收集2020年1月27日至9月27日期间在北京市门头沟区医院神经内科门诊就诊的轻型急性缺血性卒中患者作为观察组(87例),进行精简化门诊诊疗,随访7 d 美国国立卫生院卒中量表(National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale,NIHSS)和90 d 改良Rankin量表(modified Rankin scale,mRS)评分。2019年同期住院治疗的轻型急性缺血性卒中患者作为对照组(75例)。比较2组患者临床资料的差异。结果:单因素分析显示观察组发病到就诊时间[3(2,4) d] 明显长于对照组[1(0.3,3) d](Z=-4.234, P=0.000)。观察组输液时长[6(5,7) d比10(7,12) d,P=0.000]和治疗费用[(5 666.05±2 343.78)元比(12 590.11±3 815.52)元,P=0.000]明显低于对照组。2组就诊时NIHSS评分、7 d NIHSS评分、90 d mRS良好率(90 d mRS≤2分)无明显差异。结论:疫情下轻型卒中门诊精简化诊疗7 d NIHSS评分及90 d mRS良好率与住院患者相比无明显差异。而门诊患者治疗费用显著低于住院患者。在新冠肺炎疫情流行期间或轻型卒中患者不适宜住院的其他情况时,可采用门诊精简化诊疗方案进行管理。

关键词: 新型冠状病毒肺炎, 疫情, 轻型卒中, 门诊患者, 精简化诊疗

Abstract:

Objective To summarize the clinical characteristics of outpatients with acute mild stroke and analyze the therapeutic efficacy of simplified diagnosis and treatment for the patients during the period of epidemic prevention and control. Methods Eighty-seven outpatients with acute mild stroke in Beijing Men Tou Gou District Hospital from January 27 to September 27 in 2020 were enrolled as observation group (n=87). Simplified diagnosis and treatment were performed on the observation group, and the stroke-related neurologic deficits were evaluated with 7-day National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score and 90-day modified Rankin scale (mRS) score. Seventy-five patients with acute mild ischemic stroke admitted to were enrolled as control group (n=75) during the same period. The clinical characteristics, biochemistry index, 7-day NIHSS score and 90-day mRS score were analyzed and compared between control group and observation group. Results Univariate analysis showed the time from appearing stroke symptom to receiving treatment in the observation group [3(2,4) day] was significantly longer than that in the control group[ 1(0.3,3) day](Z=-4.234, P=0.000), while the infusion time of therapeutic medicine and treatment cost in observation group were significantly lower than that in control group[6(5,7) d vs 10(7,12) d, P=0.000; (5 666.05±2 343.78) yuan vs (12 590.11±3 815.52) yuan, P=0.000 ]. The two groups had no significant differences in 0-day NIHSS score, 7-day NIHSS score and 90-day mRS score (90 d mRS≤2)[2(1,3) vs 2(1,3);1(0,1) vs 1(0,3); 87.35% vs 84.00%, P>0.05]. Conclusions The patients with acute mild stroke were not necessary to be hospitalized and could be managed with simplified diagnosis and treatment in outpatient department during the period of pandemic or non-pandemic.

Key words: COVID-19, Epidemic, Mild stroke, Outpatient, Simplified diagnosis and treatment

中图分类号: