doi:10.16150/j.1671-2870.2019.05.002

Abstract

CLC Number:

R445.1

References 32

[1]	Manegold G, Tercanli S, Struben H, et al. Is a routine ultrasound in the third trimester justified? Additional fetal anomalies diagnosed after two previous unremarkable ultrasound examinations[J]. Ultraschall Med, 2011, 32(4):381-386. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245799 pmid: 21294069
[2]	Ficara A, Syngelaki A, Hammami A, et al. Value of routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation in diagnosis of fetal abnormalities[J/OL]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2019-10-08[2019-10-15]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31595569.
[3]	陶溢潮, 聂敏, 周江, 等. 中晚孕期系统超声筛查胎儿畸形的价值[J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2019, 15(9):642-645.
[4]	American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 134: fetal growth restriction[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 121(5):1122-1133. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000429658.85846.f9 URL
[5]	Moldoveanu Said AL, Oprescu DN, Catanescu NV, et al. The Role of Fetal Doppler Monitoring in Preeclampsia With/without Intrauterine Growth Delay. Conference Proceedings of the 5th Congress of The Romanian Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 20-22 April 2017, Tg-Mures,Romania,401-405.
[6]	Gordijn SJ, Beune IM, Thilaganathan B, et al. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 48(3):333-339. doi: 10.1002/uog.15884 pmid: 26909664
[7]	Baschat AA. Fetal growth restriction - from observation to intervention[J]. J Perinat Med, 2010, 38(3):239-246.
[8]	Flood K, Unterscheider J, Daly S, et al. The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: results of the multicenter PORTO Study[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 211(3):288,e1-e5.
[9]	Zhang J, Kim S, Grewal J, et al. Predicting large fetuses at birth: do multiple ultrasound examinations and longitudinal statistical modelling improve prediction?[J]. Paedia-tr Perinat Epidemiol, 2012, 26(3):199-207.
[10]	Weiner Z, Ben-Shlomo I, Beck-Fruchter R, et al. Clinical and ultrasonographic weight estimation in large for gestational age fetus[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2002, 105(1):20-24. pmid: 12270559
[11]	O'Reilly-Green CP, Divon MY. Receiver operating cha-racteristic curves of sonographic estimated fetal weight for prediction of macrosomia in prolonged pregnancies[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 1997, 9(6):403-408. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.09060403.x URL
[12]	American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 173: Fetal Macrosomia[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 128(5):e195-e209.
[13]	Chuang L, Chang CH, Yu CH, et al. Clinical application of 3-dimensional ultrasound in obstetrics: A review[J]. J Paediatr Obstet Gynaecol, 2003; 9:23-33.
[14]	Goldstein I, Reece EA, Pilu G, et al. Cerebellar measurements with ultrasonography in the evaluation of fetal growth and development[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1987, 156(5):1065-1069. pmid: 3555086
[15]	Snijders RJ, Nicolaides KH. Fetal biometry at 14-40 weeks' gestation[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 1994, 4(1):34-48. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1994.04010034.x URL
[16]	Adeyekun AA, Orji MO. Relationship between ultrasound estimated fetal gestational age and cerebellar appearance in healthy pregnant Nigerian women[J]. Ann Afr Med, 2015, 14(3):132-136. doi: 10.4103/1596-3519.149908 pmid: 26021393
[17]	Hashimoto K, Shimizu T, Shimoya K, et al. Fetal cerebellum: US appearance with advancing gestational age[J]. Radiology, 2001, 221(1):70-74. pmid: 11568323
[18]	Ho TY, Ou SF, Huang SH, et al. Assessment of growth from foot length in Taiwanese neonates[J]. Pediatr Neonatol, 2009, 50(6):287-290. doi: 10.1016/S1875-9572(09)60079-6 URL
[19]	Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics and the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Practice Bulletin No. 175: Ultrasound in Pregnancy[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 128(6):e241-e256.
[20]	中国产科超声检查指南[M]. 人民卫生出版社, 2019:55.
[21]	中国产科超声检查指南[M]. 人民卫生出版社, 2019:82.
[22]	Crino PB, Nathanson KL, Henske EP. The tuberous sclerosis complex[J]. N Engl J Med, 2006, 28, 355(13):1345-1356.
[23]	中国产科超声检查指南[M]. 人民卫生出版社, 2019:69-70.
[24]	中国产科超声检查指南[M]. 人民卫生出版社, 2019:143-145.
[25]	Pilliod RA, Page JM, Burwick RM, et al. The risk of fetal death in nonanomalous pregnancies affected by polyhydramnios[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 213(3):410,e1-e6.
[26]	Downes KL, Grantz KL, Shenassa ED. Maternal, Labor, Delivery, and Perinatal Outcomes Associated with Placental Abruption: A Systematic Review[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2017, 34(10):935-957. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1599149 URL
[27]	Eshkoli T, Weintraub AY, Sergienko R, et al. Placenta accreta: risk factors, perinatal outcomes, and consequences for subsequent births[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 208(3):219,e1-e7.
[28]	Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 107(6):1226-1232. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000219750.79480.84 URL
[29]	Obstetric Care Consensus No. 7: Placenta Accreta Spectrum[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 132(6):e259-e275.
[30]	D'Antonio F, Iacovella C, Bhide A. Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using ultrasound: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 42(5):509-517. doi: 10.1002/uog.13194 pmid: 23943408
[31]	Downes KL, Grantz KL, Shenassa ED. Maternal, Labor, Delivery, and Perinatal Outcomes Associated with Placental Abruption: A Systematic Review[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2017, 34(10):935-957. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1599149 URL
[32]	Oyelese Y, Ananth CV. Placental abruption[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 108(4):1005-1016. pmid: 17012465

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 32

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	YANG Tian, JI Xiang, NIU Jianmei, KONG Xiaoxiao, LV Mingli. Application of 2D-ultrasonography in prenatal assessment of fetal thymus development [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2021, 20(05): 471-474.
[2]	QIAN Le, JIANG Meijiao, YANG Bowen, CHEN Hui. The ultrasonic features and diagnostic performance of ultrasound for ovarian cystadenofibroma and adenofibroma [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2021, 20(02): 161-167.
[3]	. [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2020, 19(06): 610-612.
[4]	. [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2020, 19(06): 626-629.
[5]	. [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2020, 19(06): 630-637.
[6]	. [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2019, 18(06): 711-714.
[7]	. [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2019, 18(05): 487-490.
[8]	LI Min, LIU Jun, WANG Zhiqian, ZHAN Weiwei. Research on acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in quantitative assessment of testicular stiffness in non-sterility varicocele patients [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2019, 18(05): 543-547.
[9]	WANG Zhiqian, LIU Jun, LI Min, ZHAN Weiwei. Ultrasonographic features of proximal deferent duct in congenital absence of vas deferens [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2019, 18(04): 428-431.
[10]	FENG Wei, ZHU Haohui. Value of color Doppler ultrasonography in evaluation of stenosis and thrombosis of autogenous arteriovenous fistula [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2019, 18(03): 360-364.
[11]	LI Xinyue, TAN Lin, CHAI Weimin. Value of MRI combined with DWI in differential diagnosis of benign papillary lesions with malignant papillary lesions of breast [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2019, 18(03): 301-306.
[12]	LI Qinqin, YE Tingjun, MAO Minjing. A contrast analysis of thyroid ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology and thyroid ultrasound imaging reporting and data system [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2017, 16(06): 607-611.
[13]	LI Xudong, LIN Xiaozhu, FANG Weihuan, XIE Huanhuan, CHEN Nan, CHAI Weimin, YAN Fuhua, CHEN Kemin. Application of texture analysis of MR imagings in grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2017, 16(06): 601-606.
[14]	LI Junwei, XIA Hanbing, ZHAO Hongli, LIU Shuxia. Predictive value of epicardial adipose tissue thickness detected by ultrasonography for coronary artery disease [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2017, 16(03): 324-327.
[15]	. [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2017, 16(03): 250-254.