doi:10.16150/j.1671-2870.2017.03.003

[1] Revel A.Defective endometrial receptivity[J]. Fertil Steril,2012,97(5):1028-1032.
[2] Lessey BA.Assessment of endometrial receptivity[J]. Fertil Steril,2011,96(3):522-529.
[3] Teklenburg G, Salker M, Heijnen C, et al.The molecular basis of recurrent pregnancy loss: impaired natural embryo selection[J]. Mol Hum Reprod,2010,16(12):886-895.
[4] Paulson RJ.Hormonal induction of endometrial receptivity[J]. Fertil Steril,2011,96(3):530-535.
[5] Friedler S, Schenker JG, Herman A, et al.The role of ultrasonography in the evaluation of endometrial receptivity following assisted reproductive treatments: a critical review[J]. Hum Reprod Update,1996,2(4):323-335.
[6] Ma NZ, Chen L, Dai W, et al.Influence of endometrial thickness on treatment outcomes following in vitro ferti-lization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection[J]. Reprod Biol Endocrinol,2017,15(1):5.
[7] Yuan X, Saravelos SH, Wang Q, et al.Endometrial thickness as a predictor of pregnancy outcomes in 10787 fresh IVF-ICSI cycles[J]. Reprod Biomed Online,2016,33(2):197-205.
[8] Bonilla-Musoles F, Raga F, Osborne NG, et al.Endometrial receptivity: evaluation with ultrasound[J]. Ultrasound Q,2013,29(1):3-20.
[9] Habibzadeh V, Nematolahi Mahani SN, Kamyab H.The correlation of factors affecting the endometrial thickness with pregnancy outcome in the IUI cycles[J]. Iran J Reprod Med,2011,9(1):41-46.
[10] Fang R, Cai L, Xiong F, et al.The effect of endometrial thickness on the day of hCG administration on pregnancy outcome in the first fresh IVF/ICSI cycle[J]. Gynecol Endocrinol,2016,32(6):473-476.
[11] Kasius A, Smit JG, Torrance HL, et al.Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Hum Reprod Update,2014,20(4):530-541.
[12] Gonen Y, Casper RF.Prediction of implantation by the sonographic appearance of the endometrium during controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF)[J]. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf,1990,7(3):146-152.
[13] Smith SK.Regulation of angiogenesis in the endometrium[J]. Trends Endocrinol Metab,2001,12(4):147-151.
[14] Chien LW, Au HK, Chen PL, et al.Assessment of ute-rine receptivity by the endometrial-subendometrial blood flow distribution pattern in women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer[J]. Fertil Steril,2002,78(2):245-251.
[15] Riad ON, Hak AA.Assessment of endometrial receptivity using Doppler ultrasonography in infertile women undergoing intrauterine insemination[J]. Gynecol Endocrinol,2014,30(1):70-73.
[16] Gao MZ, Zhao XM, LI WY, et al.Assessment of uterine receptivity by endometrial and subendometrial blood flows measured by vaginal color doppler ultrasound in women undergoing IVF treatment[J]. J Reprod Contracept,2007,18(3):205-212.
[17] Maugey-Laulom B, Commenges-Ducos M, Jullien V, et al.Endometrial vascularity and ongoing pregnancy after IVF[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2002,104(2):137-143.
[18] Uysal S, Ozbay EP, Ekinci T, et al.Endometrial spiral artery Doppler parameters in unexplained infertility patients: is endometrial perfusion an important factor in the etiopathogenesis?[J]. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc,2012,13(3):169-171.
[19] Zebitay AG, Tutumlu M, Verit FF, et al.A comparative analysis of arterial blood flow in unexplained infertility, tubal infertility and fertile groups[J]. Gynecol Endocrinol,2016,32(6):442-445.
[20] Schild RL, Knobloch C, Dorn C, et al.Endometrial receptivity in an in vitro fertilization program as assessed by spiral artery blood flow, endometrial thickness, endometrial volume, and uterine artery blood flow[J]. Fertil Steril,2001,75(2):361-366.
[21] Chen M, He Y, Zhang P, et al.Comparison of uterine receptivity between fertile and unexplained infertile women by assessment of endometrial and subendometrial perfusion using contrast-enhanced ultrasound: which index is better--peak intensity or area under the curve?[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol,2016,42(3):654-663.
[22] Zollner U, Specketer MT, Dietl J, et al.3D-Endometrial volume and outcome of cryopreserved embryo replacement cycles[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet,2012,286(2):517-523.
[23] Ng EH, Yeung WS, Ho PC.Endometrial and subendometrial vascularity are significantly lower in patients with endometrial volume 2.5 ml or less[J]. Reprod Biomed Online,2009,18(2):262-268.
[24] Engels V, Sanfrutos L, Pérez-Medina T, et al.Evaluation of endometrial and subendometrial vascularization and endometrial volume by 3-D power Doppler ultrasound and its relationship with age and pregnancy in intraute-rine insemination cycles[J]. Gynecol Obstet Invest,2011, 72(2):117-122.
[25] Ng EH, Chan CC, Tang OS, et al.Relationship between uterine blood flow and endometrial and subendometrial blood flows during stimulated and natural cycles[J]. Fertil Steril,2006,85(3):721-727.
[26] Choudhary M, Chowdhary J, Swarankar M, et al.Predictive value of subendometrial - endometrial blood flow assessment by transvaginal 3D power doppler on the day of HCG on clinical outcome of IVF cycles[J]. Int J Res Med Sci,2015,3(11)::3114-3118.
[27] Ng EH, Chan CC, Tang OS, et al.Comparison of endometrial and subendometrial blood flow measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound between stimulated and natural cycles in the same patients[J]. Hum Reprod,2004,19(10):2385-2390.
[28] El-Mazny A, Abou-Salem N, Elshenoufy H.Doppler study of uterine hemodynamics in women with unexplained infertility[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2013,171(1):84-87.
[29] Kim A, Han JE, Yoon TK, et al.Relationship between endometrial and subendometrial blood flow measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound and pregnancy after intrauterine insemination[J]. Fertil Steril,2010, 94(2):747-752.
[30] Kim A, Jung H, Choi WJ, et al.Detection of endometrial and subendometrial vasculature on the day of embryo transfer and prediction of pregnancy during fresh in vitro fertilization cycles[J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol,2014,53(3):360-365.
[31] Mercé LT, Barco MJ, Bau S, et al.Are endometrial parameters by three-dimensional ultrasound and power Doppler angiography related to in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer outcome?[J]. Fertil Steril,2008,89(1):111-117.
[32] Wu HM, Chiang CH, Huang HY, et al.Detection of the subendometrial vascularization flow index by three-dimensional ultrasound may be useful for predicting the pregnancy rate for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer[J]. Fertil Steril,2003,79(3):507-511.
[33] Alcázar JL.Three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of endometrial receptivity: a review[J]. Reprod Biol Endocrinol,2006,4:56.
[34] Zhang T, He Y, Wang Y, et al.The role of three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound parameters measured on hCG day in the prediction of pregnancy during in vitro fertilization treatment[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2016,203:66-71.
[35] Dorn C, Reinsberg J, Willeke C, et al.Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound of the subendometrial blood flow under the administration of a contrast agent (Levovist)[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet,2004,270(2):94-98.
[36] Abdallah Y, Naji O, Saso S, et al.Ultrasound assessment of the peri-implantation uterus: a review[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2012,39(6):612-619.

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	YANG Tian, JI Xiang, NIU Jianmei, KONG Xiaoxiao, LV Mingli. Application of 2D-ultrasonography in prenatal assessment of fetal thymus development [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2021, 20(05): 471-474.
[2]	QIAN Le, JIANG Meijiao, YANG Bowen, CHEN Hui. The ultrasonic features and diagnostic performance of ultrasound for ovarian cystadenofibroma and adenofibroma [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2021, 20(02): 161-167.
[3]	. [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2020, 19(06): 610-612.
[4]	. [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2020, 19(06): 626-629.
[5]	. [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2020, 19(06): 630-637.
[6]	. [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2019, 18(06): 711-714.
[7]	LI Min, LIU Jun, WANG Zhiqian, ZHAN Weiwei. Research on acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in quantitative assessment of testicular stiffness in non-sterility varicocele patients [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2019, 18(05): 543-547.
[8]	. [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2019, 18(05): 491-495.
[9]	. [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2019, 18(05): 487-490.
[10]	WANG Zhiqian, LIU Jun, LI Min, ZHAN Weiwei. Ultrasonographic features of proximal deferent duct in congenital absence of vas deferens [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2019, 18(04): 428-431.
[11]	FENG Wei, ZHU Haohui. Value of color Doppler ultrasonography in evaluation of stenosis and thrombosis of autogenous arteriovenous fistula [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2019, 18(03): 360-364.
[12]	LI Xinyue, TAN Lin, CHAI Weimin. Value of MRI combined with DWI in differential diagnosis of benign papillary lesions with malignant papillary lesions of breast [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2019, 18(03): 301-306.
[13]	LI Qinqin, YE Tingjun, MAO Minjing. A contrast analysis of thyroid ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology and thyroid ultrasound imaging reporting and data system [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2017, 16(06): 607-611.
[14]	LI Xudong, LIN Xiaozhu, FANG Weihuan, XIE Huanhuan, CHEN Nan, CHAI Weimin, YAN Fuhua, CHEN Kemin. Application of texture analysis of MR imagings in grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2017, 16(06): 601-606.
[15]	LI Junwei, XIA Hanbing, ZHAO Hongli, LIU Shuxia. Predictive value of epicardial adipose tissue thickness detected by ultrasonography for coronary artery disease [J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2017, 16(03): 324-327.