 
  
	内科理论与实践 ›› 2025, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (04): 289-295.doi: 10.16138/j.1673-6087.2025.04.05
        
               		金诗炜, 潘萌萌, 许捷, 高山, 王焰, 刘元昉, 陶怡, 章卫平, 糜坚青( )
)
                  
        
        
        
        
    
收稿日期:2024-06-07
									
				
									
				
									
				
											出版日期:2025-07-31
									
				
											发布日期:2025-10-27
									
			通讯作者:
					糜坚青 E-mail: 基金资助:
        
               		JIN Shiwei, PAN Mengmeng, XU Jie, GAO Shan, WANG Yan, LIU Yuanfang, TAO Yi, ZHANG Weiping, MI Jianqing( )
)
			  
			
			
			
                
        
    
Received:2024-06-07
									
				
									
				
									
				
											Online:2025-07-31
									
				
											Published:2025-10-27
									
			摘要:
目的:探讨既往新型冠状病毒(新冠)感染对多发性骨髓瘤(multiple myeloma ,MM)患者接受自体造血干细胞移植(autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, auto-HSCT)后造血功能和免疫功能重建,以及移植相关并发症的影响。方法:回顾性分析2022年7月1日至2023年7月31日在上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院血液科接受auto-HSCT的 MM患者临床资料,根据移植前新冠感染史将患者分为感染组和非感染组,比较2组患者在造血细胞植入时间、移植相关感染、植入综合征、免疫球蛋白恢复、淋巴细胞亚群以及移植后疗效评估等方面的差异。结果:共纳入63例患者,感染组32例,非感染组31例。2组患者移植后粒系和巨核系植入时间、移植相关感染及植入综合征发生率均无统计学差异。感染组移植前外周血CD3+T、CD3+CD8+T和CD19+B淋巴细胞计数均高于非感染组(P<0.05),但移植后上述淋巴细胞亚群计数2组间无统计学差异。移植后第8天感染组干扰素(interferon,IFN)-γ较非感染组显著升高(P=0.011)。移植后3个月感染组患者多克隆免疫球蛋白恢复比例较非感染组低(P=0.026),但2组患者疗效评估差异无显著性。结论:MM患者感染新冠痊愈后接受auto-HSCT是安全可靠的,植入时间未见延长,移植相关并发症未见增加,但既往新冠感染者存在免疫功能异常,尤其是移植后多克隆免疫球蛋白重建滞后,建议及时补充人免疫球蛋白,预防感染等并发症。
中图分类号:
金诗炜, 潘萌萌, 许捷, 高山, 王焰, 刘元昉, 陶怡, 章卫平, 糜坚青. 既往新型冠状病毒感染对多发性骨髓瘤患者自体造血干细胞移植的影响[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2025, 20(04): 289-295.
JIN Shiwei, PAN Mengmeng, XU Jie, GAO Shan, WANG Yan, LIU Yuanfang, TAO Yi, ZHANG Weiping, MI Jianqing. Effects of prior COVID-19 infection on autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients[J]. Journal of Internal Medicine Concepts & Practice, 2025, 20(04): 289-295.
 
												
												表1
2组MM患者移植前的基线特征比较 [M(Q1, Q3)/n(%)]
| 项目 | 总例数(n=63) | 非感染组(n=31) | 感染组(n=32) | Z/χ2 | P | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄(岁) | 59(53, 56) | 59(51, 63) | 59(63, 65) | 0.551 | 0.582 | 
| 性别[n(%)] | 0.813 | 0.367 | |||
| 男性 | 35(55.6) | 19(61.3) | 16(50.0) | ||
| 女性 | 28(44.4) | 12(38.7) | 16(50.0) | ||
| 疾病类型[n(%)] | 0.542 | ||||
| IgG | 26(41.3) | 16(51.6) | 10(31.3) | ||
| IgA | 16(25.4) | 7(22.6) | 9(28.1) | ||
| IgD | 7(11.1) | 3(9.7) | 4(12.5) | ||
| 轻链型 | 12(19.0) | 4(12.9) | 8(25.0) | ||
| 未分泌型 | 2(3.2) | 1(3.2) | 1(3.1) | ||
| ISS分期[n(%)] | 0.235 | 0.889 | |||
| Ⅰ | 18(28.6) | 8(25.8) | 10(31.3) | ||
| Ⅱ | 35(55.6) | 18(58.1) | 17(53.1) | ||
| Ⅲ | 10(15.9) | 5(16.1) | 5(15.6) | ||
| R-ISS分期[n (%)] | 0.508 | 0.776 | |||
| Ⅰ | 14(22.2) | 6(19.4) | 8(25.0) | ||
| Ⅱ | 42(66.7) | 22(71.0) | 20(62.5) | ||
| Ⅲ | 7(11.1) | 3(9.7) | 4(12.5) | ||
| auto-HSCT前疗效[n(%)] | 3.934 | 0.269 | |||
| PR | 4(6.3) | 2(6.5) | 2(6.3) | ||
| VGPR | 23(36.5) | 15(48.4) | 8(25.0) | ||
| CR | 11(17.5) | 4(12.9) | 7(21.9) | ||
| sCR | 25(39.7) | 10(32.3) | 15(46.9) | 
 
												
												表2
2组患者auto-HSCT后造血细胞植入情况及移植并发症比较[M(Q1, Q3)/n(%)]
| 项目 | 非感染组(n=31) | 感染组(n=32) | Z/χ2 | P | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD34(×106/kg) | 4.76(2.88,5.70) | 3.68(2.83,5.20) | 1.072 | 0.284 | 
| 粒系植入时间(d) | 11.0(11.0, 12.0) | 11.0(10.0, 12.0) | 0.349 | 0.727 | 
| 巨核系植入时间(d) | 12.0(11.0, 14.0) | 12.5(11.0, 14.0) | 0.585 | 0.558 | 
| 植入综合征[n(%)] | 10.0(32.3) | 12.0(37.5) | 0.190 | 0.663 | 
| 感染[n(%)] | 6.0(19.4) | 9.0(28.1) | 0.668 | 0.414 | 
| auto-HSCT后3个月疗效[n(%)] | 2.914 | 0.405 | ||
| PR | 1.0(3.2) | 1.0(3.1) | ||
| VGPR | 5.0(16.1) | 4.0(12.5) | ||
| CR | 6.0(19.4) | 2.0(6.3) | ||
| sCR | 19.0(61.3) | 25.0(78.1) | 
 
												
												表3
转阴后1~3个月组和转阴后>3个月组造血细胞植入情况及移植并发症比较[M(Q1, Q3)/n(%)]
| 项目 | 1~3个月组(n=18) | >3个月组(n=14) | Z/χ2 | P | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD34(×106/kg) | 3.41(2.43,5.07) | 4.04(3.08,5.45) | 0.874 | 0.382 | 
| 粒系植入时间(d) | 11.0(10.0, 12.0) | 11.0(11.0, 12.0) | 0.102 | 0.918 | 
| 巨核系植入时间(d) | 12.0(11.0, 13.0) | 13.0(12.0, 14.0) | 0.443 | 0.658 | 
| 植入综合征[n(%)] | 7.0(38.9) | 5.0(35.7) | 0.034 | 0.854 | 
| 感染[n(%)] | 5.0(27.8) | 4.0(28.6) | 0.002 | 0.960 | 
| auto-HSCT后3个月疗效[n(%)] | 0.874 | 0.832 | ||
| PR | 1.0(5.6) | 0(0) | ||
| VGPR | 2.0(11.1) | 2.0(14.3) | ||
| CR | 1.0(5.6) | 1.0(7.1) | ||
| sCR | 14.0(77.8) | 11.0(78.6) | 
 
												
												表4
2组auto-HSCT前后细胞因子比较[M(Q1, Q3), pg/mL]
| 细胞因子 | 感染组(n=32) | 非感染组(n=31) | Z | P | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL-6 | ||||
| 移植前 | 2.7(1.8,5.2) | 3.3(1.2,7.1) | 0.344 | 0.731 | 
| 回输后第8天 | 78.9(31.5,198.5) | 112.1(35.1,191.8) | 0.316 | 0.752 | 
| IL-5 | ||||
| 移植前 | 2.7(1.8,5.2) | 2.9(0.2,5.9) | 0.816 | 0.415 | 
| 回输后第8天 | 200.1(53.4,483.8) | 302.7(69.6,1 048.3) | 0.454 | 0.650 | 
| IL-2R | ||||
| 移植前 | 556.0(396.0,701.0) | 452.0(344.8,571.8) | 2.007 | 0.054 | 
| 回输后第8天 | 1 128.0(865.0,1811.0) | 1 085.5(850.8,1 810.5) | 0.346 | 0.736 | 
| IFN-γ | ||||
| 移植前 | 2.6(0.7,7.9) | 2.6(1.2,4.2) | 0.297 | 0.767 | 
| 回输后第8天 | 5.0(1.7,8.7) | 2.0(0.4,4.1) | 2.532 | 0.011 | 
| [1] | Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma: 2022 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management[J]. Am J Hematol, 2022, 97(8):1086-1107. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26590 pmid: 35560063 | 
| [2] | 中国医师协会血液科医师分会, 中华医学会血液学分会. 中国多发性骨髓瘤诊治指南(2022年修订)[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2022, 61(5):480-487. | 
| Chinese Hematology Association, Chinese Society of Hematology. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma in China (2022 revision)[J]. Chin J Intern Med, 2022, 61(5):480-487. | |
| [3] | Dimopoulos MA, Moreau P, Terpos E, et al. Multiple myeloma: EHA-ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diag-nosis, treatment and follow-up[J]. Ann Oncol, 2021, 32(3):309-322. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.11.014 pmid: 33549387 | 
| [4] | 中华医学会血液学分会浆细胞疾病学组, 中国医师协会多发性骨髓瘤专业委员会. 中国多发性骨髓瘤自体造血干细胞移植指南(2021年版)[J]. 中华血液学杂志, 2021, 42(5):353-357. | 
| Plasma Cell Disease Group, Chinese Society of Hematology, Chinese Medical Association, Chinese Myeloma Committee-Chinese Hematology Association. Chinese guidelines of autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma (2021)[J]. Chin J Hematol, 2021, 42(5):353-357. | |
| [5] | Terpos E, Musto P, Engelhardt M, et al. Management of patients with multiple myeloma and COVID-19 in the post pandemic era: a consensus paper from the European Myeloma Network (EMN)[J]. Leukemia, 2023, 37(6):1175-1185. doi: 10.1038/s41375-023-01920-1 pmid: 37142661 | 
| [6] | 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 新型冠状病毒感染诊疗方案(试行第十版)[J]. 国际流行病学传染病学杂志, 2023, 50(1):1-7. | 
| National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Diagnosis and treatment plan for COVID-19 (trial version 10)[J]. Chin J Clin Infect Dis, 2023, 50(1):1-7. | |
| [7] | Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2014, 15(12):e538-e548. | 
| [8] | Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2016, 17(8):e328-e346. | 
| [9] | Maiolino A, Biasoli I, Lima J, et al. Engraftment syndrome following autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: definition of diagnostic criteria[J]. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003, 31(5):393-397. | 
| [10] | Garnica M, Crusoe EQ, Ribeiro G, et al. COVID-19 in multiple myeloma patients: frequencies and risk factors for hospitalization, ventilatory support, intensive care admission and mortality -cooperative registry from the Grupo Brasileiro de Mieloma Multiplo (GBRAM)[J]. Hematol Transfus Cell Ther, 2024, 46(2):153-160. | 
| [11] | Vijenthira A, Gong IY, Fox TA, et al. Outcomes of patients with hematologic malignancies and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 3377 patients[J]. Blood, 2020, 136(25):2881-2892. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020008824 pmid: 33113551 | 
| [12] | Ljungman P, Mikulska M, de la Camara R, et al. The challenge of COVID-19 and hematopoietic cell transplantation, EBMT recommendations for management of hematopoietic cell transplant recipients, their donors, and patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy[J]. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2020, 55(11):2071-2076. | 
| [13] | Maurer K, Saucier A, Kim HT, et al. COVID-19 and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and immune effector cell therapy: a US cancer center experience[J]. Blood Adv, 2021, 5(3):861-871. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003883 pmid: 33560397 | 
| [14] | Zanza C, Romenskaya T, Manetti AC, et al. Cytokine storm in COVID-19: immunopathogenesis and therapy[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2022, 58(2):144. | 
| [15] | Diao B, Wang C, Tan Y, et al. Reduction and functional exhaustion of T cells in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)[J]. Front Immunol, 2020, 11:827. | 
| [16] | Berentschot JC, Drexhage HA, Aynekulu Mersha DG, et al. Immunological profiling in long COVID: overall low grade inflammation and T-lymphocyte senescence and increased monocyte activation correlating with increasing fatigue severity[J]. Front Immunol, 2023, 14:1254899. | 
| [17] | Garcia-Gasalla M, Berman-Riu M, Rodriguez A, et al. Elevated complement C3 and increased CD8 and type 1 helper lymphocyte T populations in patients with post-COVID-19 condition[J]. Cytokine, 2023, 169:156295. | 
| [18] | Xu SW, Ilyas I, Weng JP. Endothelial dysfunction in COVID-19: an overview of evidence, biomarkers, mechanisms and potential therapies[J]. Acta Pharmacol Sin, 2023, 44(4):695-709. | 
| [19] | González-Calle V, Cerdá S, Labrador J, et al. Recovery of polyclonal immunoglobulins one year after autologous stem cell transplantation as a long-term predictor marker of progression and survival in multiple myeloma[J]. Haematologica, 2017, 102(5):922-931. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2016.158345 pmid: 28126960 | 
| [20] | 郭巧花, 秦小琪, 王世芳, 等. 多发性骨髓瘤患者自体造血干细胞移植后免疫球蛋白重建及生存分析[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2022, 35(3):195-200+206. | 
| Guo QH, Qin XQ, Wang SF, et al. Immunoglobulin reconstitution and survival analysis of multiple myeloma patients after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation[J]. J Clin Hematol, 2022, 35(3):195-200. | 
| [1] | 虞文嫣, 郭瑛, 唐源, 欧阳皖雁, 黄燕, 胡苏, 陶怡, 糜坚青. 多技术多组学融合视角下的多发性骨髓瘤伴髓外病变教学初探[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2025, 24(05): 562-565. | 
| [2] | 史浩, 王朝晖. 多发性骨髓瘤肾损伤治疗策略:新药和新疗法[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2025, 20(03): 185-190. | 
| [3] | 刘嘉琳, 张莉. 中西医结合呼吸康复治疗在新型冠状病毒肺炎中的研究进展[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2025, 20(01): 63-66. | 
| [4] | 唐暐, 蔡铭慈, 沈一格, 张守杰, 葛健, 赵维莅. 口疮散治疗自体造血干细胞移植患者口腔黏膜炎疗效观察[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2025, 20(01): 14-17. | 
| [5] | 秦野1,陈蓉蓉2. 基于社会网络分析方法的新型冠状病毒肺炎相关国际科研合作研究[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2024, 29(1): 150-160. | 
| [6] | 洪冬羊1,3, 王金霞2,3, 张虹洋2,3, 曹紫阳2,3, 晏紫君2,3, 邹琳2,3. 2022年新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情对中国大学生心理影响[J]. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci, 2024, 29(1): 141-149. | 
| [7] | 王焰, 孙青芳, 张佼佼, 糜坚青, 朱伟嵘. 中医药在多发性骨髓瘤周围神经病变中的诊治[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2024, 19(05): 347-350. | 
| [8] | 揭志军, 沙家凤, 张萌. 新型冠状病毒重复感染和应对[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2024, 19(01): 25-30. | 
| [9] | 王亚婷, 贺春伟, 付紫玉, 王慧, 马德东. 一氧化氮在新型冠状病毒感染中的应用[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2024, 19(01): 82-87. | 
| [10] | 黄仙娜, 陈云册, 周敏, 倪磊. 糖尿病患者合并新型冠状病毒感染的研究进展[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2024, 19(01): 77-81. | 
| [11] | 魏易洪, 马子霖, 周端, 邓兵, 唐靖一. 60岁以上新型冠状病毒奥密克戎变异株感染者核酸转阴时间影响因素分析[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2023, 18(06): 377-382. | 
| [12] | 周芮, 吴涛, 薛锋, 田红娟, 刘文慧, 毛东锋. 达雷妥尤单抗治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤疗效及安全性分析[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2023, 18(05): 348-351. | 
| [13] | 李小丽, 木卡大斯·热合曼, 郑丽, 葛玉鑫, 蒋婕, 童建菁. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间上海基层医务人员心理健康状况及影响因素分析[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2023, 18(05): 316-321. | 
| [14] | 王焰, 陶怡, 金诗炜, 糜坚青, 刘元昉. 调整剂量的达妥木单抗联合DCEP治疗硼替佐米和来那度胺双耐药的多发性骨髓瘤[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2023, 18(03): 165-170. | 
| [15] | 陶怡, 糜坚青. 2023年美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)《多发性骨髓瘤指南》(第2版)更新解读[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2023, 22(02): 121-126. | 
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
| 全文 |  | |||||
| 摘要 |  | |||||