On the Writing of Translation History: A State-Governance-Based Approach

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2021.05.003

Abstract

CLC Number:

H059

GAO Yuxia, REN Dongsheng. On the Writing of Translation History: A State-Governance-Based Approach[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 21(5): 30-39.

Figures/Tables 2

References 43

[1]	Bachmann-Medick, D. 2009. Introduction: The translational turn[J]. Translation Studies 2(1) :2-16. doi: 10.1080/14781700802496118 URL
[2]	Bassnett, S. & D. Johnston. 2019. The outward turn in translation studies[J]. The Translator 25(3) :181-188. doi: 10.1080/13556509.2019.1701228 URL
[3]	Beukes, A. 2007. Governmentality and the good offices of translation in 20th-century South Africa[J]. South African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 25(2) : 115-130. doi: 10.2989/16073610709486451 URL
[4]	Dean, M. 2010. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society (2nd edition)[M]. Los Angles and London: Sage.
[5]	Ellis, J. 2017. The role of translation in transnational governance [J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing 22(1-2):165-184.
[6]	Foucault, M. 2007. Security, Territory, Population[M]. London: Palgrave.
[7]	Hung, E. 2005. Translation in China—An analytical survey. First century B.C.E. to early twentieth century [A]. In E.Hung & J.Wakabayashi (eds.).Asian Translation Traditions[C]. Manchester: St. Jerome. 67-107.
[8]	Koskinen, K. 2014. Institutional translation: The art of government by translation[J]. Perspectives 22(4):479-492. doi: 10.1080/0907676X.2014.948887 URL
[9]	Meylaerts, R. 2010. Multilingualism and translation [A]. In Y. Gambier & L. van Doorslaer (eds.). Handbook of Translation Studies Vol. 1[C]. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Johns Benjamins. 227-230.
[10]	Perryman, J., S. J. Ball, A. Braun & M. Maguire. 2017. Translating policy: Governmentality and the reflective teacher[J]. Journal of Education Policy 32(6):745-756. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2017.1309072 URL
[11]	Prieto Ramos, F. (ed.) 2018. Institutional Translation for International Governance[C]. London, Oxford, New York, New Delhi & Sydney: Bloomsbury.
[12]	Pym, A. 2007. Method in Translation History [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
[13]	Rizzi, A., B. Lang & A. Pym. 2019. What is Translation History?A Trust-Based Approach[M]. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
[14]	Rose, N. 1996. Governing “advanced” liberal democracies [A]. In A. Barry,T.Osborne & N. Rose (eds.).Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government [C]. London: UC,L Press.37-64.
[15]	Schaffner, C. 2018. Translation and institutions [A]. In F.Fernández & J.Evans (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Politics[C]. London & New York: Routledgd: Taylor & Francis Group. 204-220.
[16]	Torikai, K. 2009. Voices of the Invisible Presence: Diplomatic Interpreters in Post-World War Ⅱ Japan [M]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
[17]	Zhou, X. & S. Sun. 2017. Bibliography-based quantitative translation history[J]. Perspectives (1):98-119.
[18]	Zwischenberger, C. 2019. From inward to outward: The need for translation studies to become outward-going[J]. The Translator 25(3):256-268. doi: 10.1080/13556509.2019.1654060 URL
[19]	曾国藩. 2010. 请造轮船折 [A]. 李瀚章编.曾文正公全集(四)[C]. 北京:中国书店. 67-69.
[20]	陈秀. 2015. 国家行为的实证考察与界定研究[J]. 山东科技大学学报(社会科学版)(2):27-36.
[21]	董晓波. 2018. 法律翻译为全球治理贡献中国智慧[N]. 中国社会科学报(6-26):003.
[22]	方仪力. 2011. 口述历史:一种新的翻译史研究方法[J]. 译苑新谭(3):82-91.
[23]	高玉霞、任东升. 2020. 佛经“奉诏译”:国家翻译实践之滥觞[J]. 翻译季刊 95:1-10.
[24]	耿强. 2012. 国家机构对外翻译规范研究——以“熊猫丛书”英译中国文学为例[J]. 上海翻译(1):1-7.
[25]	胡范铸、胡亦名. 2021. 政治传播语言学的逻辑起点[J]. 社会科学(1):17-26.
[26]	姬旦. 2001. 周礼(钱玄等注译)[M]. 长沙:岳麓书社.
[27]	孔慧怡. 2005. 重写翻译史 [M]. 香港: 香港中文大学出版社.
[28]	梁晨等. 2015. 量化数据库与历史研究[J]. 历史研究(2):113-128.
[29]	梁启超. 2015. 论译书 [A]. 梁启超编.饮冰室合集(第一册)[C]. 北京:中华书局. 64-76.
[30]	林文艺. 2014. 主流意识形态语境中的中国对外文化交流[D]. 福州:福建师范大学.
[31]	任东升、高玉霞. 2015. 国家翻译实践初探[J]. 中国外语(3):92-97.
[32]	任东升. 2016. 国家翻译实践史书写的初步探索[J]. 上海翻译(5):1-5.
[33]	任东升. 2019. 国家翻译实践概念体系[J]. 外语研究(4):68-73.
[34]	任东升. 2020. 主持人语:民族翻译与国家治理[J]. 民族翻译(2):5-8.
[35]	宋濂. 2000. 元史(“二十四史”简体字本)[M]. 北京:中华书局.
[36]	谭刚毅. 2018. 访真存史,索隐钩深[N]. 解放日报(8-11):007.
[37]	滕梅、吴菲菲. 2014. 国家翻译机构对翻译活动的规范——以中央编译局马列著作及“毛著”翻译为例[J]. 中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版)(6):110-115.
[38]	王东风. 2019. 翻译与国运兴衰[J]. 中国翻译(1):30-41.
[39]	夏登山、邵有学. 2011. 论翻译思想史的研究对象与撰写方法[J]. 外国语(2):72-77.
[40]	张曼涛. 1978. 佛典翻译史论 [M]. 台北: 大乘文化出版社.
[41]	郑晔. 2012. 国家机构赞助下中国文学的对外译介[D]. 上海:上海外国语大学.
[42]	中国第一历史档案馆. 2000. 嘉庆道光两朝上谕档52 [M]. 桂林: 广西师范大学出版社.
[43]	邹振环. 2017. 20世纪中国翻译史学史[M]. 上海:中西书局.

On the Writing of Translation History: A State-Governance-Based Approach

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 2

References 43

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	YANG Zhenyuan. From Footnoting to Being Footnoted: On the Luian Mindological Awareness of Benxin for Outward Translation of Chinese Literature [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 126-132.
[2]	TIAN Lu, LIU Zequan. Knowledge Recognition and Multimodal Narration in the Translation of Children’s Popular Science Picturebooks: A Case Study of The Magic School Bus [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 140-147.
[3]	HUANG Youyi. Heralding a New Phase in T&I Education [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 17-21.
[4]	MU Lei, LIU Xinyuan. Analyzing Doctor of Translation and Interpreting in the Context of Transformation of Knowledge Production Mode [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 22-29.
[5]	HUANG Qin, WANG Yajun. On the Translation of Peking Opera as Local Knowledge and its Global Paths [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 37-45.
[6]	WANG Hongtao. Exploring the Translation and Transmission of the Classical Chinese Literary Theories in the Western Anglophone World: A Survey Based on the Questionnaires Conducted in the UK, USA and Australia [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(4): 33-45.
[7]	LVU Hui, CHEN Daliang. Development of a Translation Horizon Assessment Model for Classical Chinese Poetry [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(4): 77-86.
[8]	FENG Zhiwei, DING Xiaomei. Neural Network Models in Natural Language Processing [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(4): 98-110.
[9]	MENG Xiangchun. Transknowletology: Its Naming and Concept Construction, [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(3): 55-64.
[10]	YUE Feng, CHEN Zeyu. On Translating zhishi fanyixue into Metatranslatology in the Light of its Principle of Real Meanings, Full Preparations and TT Aesthetic Conceptions [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(3): 65-73.
[11]	ZHOU Hongmin. An Incongruity Theory-based Approach to Interpreting and Translating Literary Humor: A Case Study of The Republic of Wine [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(2): 148-155.
[12]	DING Jianxin, ZHAO Yi. The Desire for Discourse: Perspectives on Richthofen’s “Seidenst Rossen” [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(2): 156-160.
[13]	FENG Quangong. The Overall Approach to Studying Translator Groups:A Review of A Study on English Translators of Jiangsu Classic Literature [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(1): 153-160.
[14]	QIN Jianghua. Translation as Knowledge Production, Management, and Utilization: Towards Transknowletology [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(1): 60-71.
[15]	PANG Xiucheng. Transknowletology: the Translator’s Personal Knowledge and Knowing Modal [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(1): 72-82.