颜色及颜色词加工中的性别差异:混合效应模型的证据

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2024.05.015

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

颜色及颜色词的认知加工过程十分复杂,涉及众多影响因素。性别作为重要的生理及文化因素对颜色及颜色词认知加工过程有重要影响,但具体影响机制尚未有定论。本研究考察同一文化背景下,不同性别受试对同一颜色及颜色词的加工过程,并采用线性混合效应模型对实验数据进行拟合。研究发现,女性在颜色及颜色词的加工速度方面显著优于男性,说明性别对颜色及颜色词认知的加工产生影响。研究结果还表明,加工速度只是颜色及颜色词加工的一个维度,就加工质量而言,女性在颜色判断任务中具有显著加工优势,而男性则在颜色词判断任务中表现出显著优势。

关键词: 颜色, 颜色词, 性别差异, 知觉符号系统理论, 线性混合效应模型

Abstract:

The cognitive processing of color and color words is highly complex and involves many influencing variables. Gender, as an important biological and cultural factor, profoundly impacts the cognitive processing of color and color words; however, the specific mechanisms of this influence remain inconclusive. This study examined the processing of the same color and color word among participants of different genders within the same cultural context, and modelling the experimental data with linear mixed-effect models. The results indicated that females significantly outperformed males in the processing speed of colors and color words, suggesting that gender impacts the fundamental processing mechanisms underlying color and color word cognition. Moreover, the results showed that processing speed is just one dimension of color and color word processing; in terms of processing quality, females demonstrated a significant advantage in the color judgment tasks, while males showed notable superiority in the color discrimination tasks.

Key words: color, color words, gender differences, perceptual symbol system theory, linear mixed-effect model

中图分类号:

范琳, 郑诗扬. 颜色及颜色词加工中的性别差异:混合效应模型的证据[J]. 当代外语研究, 2024, 24(5): 163-178.

FAN Lin, ZHENG Shiyang. Gender Differences in Color and Color Word Processing: Evidence from Mixed-effects Modeling[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024, 24(5): 163-178.

图/表 7

图1

表1

表2

图2

图3

图4

图5

参考文献 59

[1]	Alansari B. & K. Baroun. 2004. Gender and cultural performance differences on the Stroop Color and Word test: A comparative study [J]. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 32(3): 235-245.
[2]	Al-Rasheed A. S. 2015. An experimental study of gender and cultural differences in hue preference[J]. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1-5.
[3]	Baroun K. & B. Alansari. 2006. Gender differences in performance on the Stroop test [J]. Social Behavior and Personality: An international Journal 34(3): 309-318.
[4]	Barr D. J., R. Levy & C. Scheepers, et al. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal[J]. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3): 255-278.
[5]	Barsalou L. W. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems[J]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 577-660. pmid: 11301525
[6]	Bates D., M. Maechler & B. Bolker, et al. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4[J]. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1): 1-48.
[7]	Berlin B. & P. Kay. 1969. Basic Color Terms: Their University and Evolution[M]. California: California UP.
[8]	Bone R. N. & H. J. Eysenck. 1972. Extraversion, field-dependence, and the Stroop test[J]. Perceptual and Motor Skills 34(3): 873-874. pmid: 5040502
[9]	Boynton R. M. & C. X. Olson. 1990. Salience of chromatic basic color terms confirmed by three measures[J]. Vision Research 30(9): 1311-1317. pmid: 2219747
[10]	Brown V. A. 2021. An introduction to linear mixed-effects modeling in R[J]. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 4(1):1-19.
[11]	Brugnolo A., F., De Carli & J. Accardo et al. 2016. An updated Italian normative dataset for the Stroop color word test (SCWT)[J]. Neurological Sciences 37: 365-372. doi: 10.1007/s10072-015-2428-2 pmid: 26621362
[12]	Cameron D. 2010. Sex/gender, language and the new biologism[J]. Applied Linguistics 31(2): 173-192.
[13]	Chen N., K. Nakamura & K. Watanabe. 2023. An automatic red-female association tested by the Stroop task[J]. Acta Psychologica 238: 1-16.
[14]	Connell L. 2007. Representing object color in language comprehension[J]. Cognition 102(3): 476-485. pmid: 16616075
[15]	Datta K., N. Nebhinani & A. Dixit. 2020. Gender differences in performance on Hindi-English Stroop task[J]. Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 64(1): 45-9.
[16]	Davidoff J. & D. Roberson. 2004. Preserved thematic and impaired taxonomic categorization: A case study[J]. Language and Cognitive Processes 19: 137-174.
[17]	Davies I. R. 1998. A study of color grouping in three languages: A test of the linguistic relativity hypothesis[J]. British Journal of Psychology 89: 433-452.
[18]	Downing K., S. W. Chan & W. K. Downing et al. 2008. Measuring gender differences in cognitive functioning[J]. Multicultural Education and Technology Journal 2(1): 4-18.
[19]	Heider E. R. & D. C. Olivier. 1972. The structure of the color space in naming and memory for two languages[J]. Cognitive Psychology 3(2): 337-354.
[20]	Hurlbert A. C. & Y. Ling. 2007. Biological components of sex differences in color preference[J]. Current Biology 16(16): 623-625.
[21]	Ioan S., M. Sandulache & S. Avramescu et al. 2007. Red is a distractor for men in competition[J]. Evolution and Human Behavior 28(4): 285-293.
[22]	Kay P. & C. K. McDaniel. 1978. The linguistic significance of the meanings of basic color terms[J]. Language 54(3): 610-646.
[23]	Kay P., B. Berlin & W. Merrifield. 1991. Biocultural implications of systems of color naming[J]. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 1(1): 12-25.
[24]	Lakoff G. 2008. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
[25]	Li Y., J. Du, & Q. Song, et al. 2021. An ERP study of the temporal course of gender-color Stroop effect[J]. Frontiers in Psychology 11: 1-9.
[26]	Locke J. 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding[M]. In P.H. Nidditch (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[27]	MacLeod C. M. 1991. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review[J]. Psychological Bulletin 109(2): 163-203. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163 pmid: 2034749
[28]	Mekarski J. E., T. R. H. Cutmore & W. Suboski. 1996. Gender differences during processing of the Stroop task[J]. Perceptual and Motor Skills 83(2): 563-568. pmid: 8902031
[29]	Peretti P. O. 1969. Cross-sex and cross-educational level performance in a color-word interference task[J]. Psychonomic Science 16(6): 321-323.
[30]	Peretti P. O. 1971. Effects of noncompetitive, competitive instructions and sex on performance in a color- word interference task[J]. Journal of Psychology 79: 67-70. pmid: 5116723
[31]	R Core Team. 2022. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [CP/OL]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [2022-6-23]. https://www.r-project.org/ .
[32]	Richter T. & R. A. Zwaan. 2009. Processing of color words activates color representations[J]. Cognition 111(3): 383-389. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.011 pmid: 19338983
[33]	Roberson D. & J. Davidoff. 2000. The categorical perception of colors and facial expressions: The effect of verbal interference[J]. Memory and Cognition 28: 977-986.
[34]	Roberson D., I. Davies & J. Davidoff. 2000. Color categories are not universal: Replications and new evidence from a Stone-age culture[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129: 369-398.
[35]	Roberson D., J. Davidoff & I. R. L. Davies, et al. 2005. Color categories: Evidence for the cultural relativity hypothesis[J]. Cognitive Psychology 50: 378-411. pmid: 15893525
[36]	Rosch E. H. 1973. Natural categories[J]. Cognitive Psychology 4(3): 328-350.
[37]	Rosch E. H. 1975. Cognitive representations of semantic categories[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104(3): 192.
[38]	Saito M. 1996. A comparative study of color preferences in Japan, China and Indonesia, with emphasis on the preference for white[J]. Perceptual and Motor Skills 83(1): 115-128. doi: 10.2466/pms.1996.83.1.115 pmid: 8873184
[39]	Sapir E. 1921. Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech[M]. New York: Harcourt Brace & Company.
[40]	Sarmány I. 1977. Different performance in Stroop’s interference test from the aspect of personality and sex[J]. Studia Psychologica 19(1): 60-67.
[41]	Schirillo J. A., & F. U. Wake. 2001. Tutorial on the Importance of Color in Language and Culture[J]. Color Research and Application 26: 79-92.
[42]	Simmons W. K., V. Ramjee & M. S. Beauchamp, et al. 2007. A common neural substrate for perceiving and knowing about color[J]. Neuropsychologia 45(12): 2802-2810. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.002 pmid: 17575989
[43]	Singh S. P. 1991. Sex differences in cognitive functioning[J]. Psycho-Lingua 21: 47-50.
[44]	Stanfield R. A. & R. A. Zwaan. 2001. The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition[J]. Psychological Science 12: 153-156. pmid: 11340925
[45]	Stroop J. R. 1935. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology 18(6): 643-662.
[46]	von Kluge S. 1992. Trading accuracy for speed: Gender differences on a Stroop task under mild performance anxiety[J]. Perceptual and Motor Skills 75(2): 651-657. pmid: 1408631
[47]	Weiss E. M., G. Kemmler & E. A. Deisenhammer, et al. 2003. Sex differences in cognitive functions[J]. Personality and Individual Differences 35(4): 863-875.
[48]	Whorf B. L. 1938. Some verbal categories of Hopi[J]. Language 14(4): 275-286.
[49]	Zwaan R. A., C. J. Madden & R. H. Yaxley, et al. 2004. Moving words: Dynamic mental representations in language comprehension[J]. Cognitive Science 28: 611-619.
[50]	Zwaan R. A., R. A. Stanfield & R. H. Yaxley. 2002. Do language comprehenders routinely represent the shapes of objects?[J]. Psychological Science 13: 168-171. pmid: 11934002
[51]	马拯、贾锦萱、吴诗玉. 2022. 混合效应模型框架下反应时数据的分析:原理和实践[J]. 外语教学理论与实践(1):35-46.
[52]	明雨晴. 2020. 模因论视域下化妆品新兴颜色词语研究[D]. 辽宁: 渤海大学硕士学位论文.
[53]	吴诗玉. 2019. 第二语言加工及R语言应用[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社.
[54]	尹向阳. 2015. 情感隐喻与颜色词的语义关联阐释[J]. 河北经贸大学学报(综合版) 15():48-51.
[55]	袁欣、陈昌柏. 2023. 汉日英颜色词“红色”的文化内涵异同点对比分析[J]. 今古文创(6):108-111.
[56]	张积家、陈月琴、谢晓兰. 2005. 3-6岁儿童对11种基本颜色命名和分类研究[J]. 应用心理学(11):227-232.
[57]	张积家、段新焕. 2007. 汉语常用颜色词的概念结构[J]. 心理学探新(1):45-52.
[58]	张积家、方燕红、谢书书. 2012. 颜色词与颜色认知的关系:相互作用理论及其证据[J]. 心理科学进展 20(7):949-962.
[59]	张积家、林新英. 2005. 大学生颜色词分类的研究[J]. 心理科学(28):19-22.

口红色号	颜色名称	RGB
MAC 316	番茄色	168,61,67
MAC Brick-O-La	豆沙色	186,86,98
MAC dubonnet	牛血色	153,38,51
YSL 425	草莓色	177,27,28

		男性				女性
		一致		不一致		一致		不一致
颜色词判断	反应时		5011(37.7)		5681(42.4)		2046(21.8)		1996(21.5)
颜色词判断	准确率		88 (1.5)		42 (2.3)		81 (1.7)		34 (2.1)
颜色判断	反应时		8160(33.7)		7454(10.9)		2687(58.8)		6639(35.1)
颜色判断	准确率		61 (2.3)		57 (2.3)		87 (1.5)		88 (1.5)