New Perspective on Translation Quality Assessment in Translation Teaching: An Industry Assessment Model

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2024.05.005

Abstract

CLC Number:

H315.9

CHENG Shuang, ZHANG Yushuang. New Perspective on Translation Quality Assessment in Translation Teaching: An Industry Assessment Model[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024, 24(5): 45-56.

Figures/Tables 11

References 27

[1]	Delizée A. 2011. A global rating scale for the summative assessment of pragmatic translation at Master’s level: an attempt to combine academic and professional criteria [A]. In I. Depraetere (ed.). Perspectives on Translation Quality[C]. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG. 9-23.
[2]	Mateo R.M. 2014. A deeper look into metrics for translation quality assessment (TQA): a case study[J]. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies(49):73-94.
[3]	Mateo R.M., S. M. Martínez & A. J. M. Guijarro. 2017. The modular assessment pack: a new approach to translation quality assessment at the Directorate General for Translation[J]. Perspectives (1):18-48.
[4]	Moorkens J., S. Castilho & F. Gaspari, et al. 2018. Translation Quality Assessment: From Principles to Practice[M]. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.
[5]	Morin K. H., F. Barbin & F. Moreau, et al. 2017. Translation technology and learner performance: professionally-oriented translation quality assessment with three translation technologies[A]. In A. L. Jakobsen & B. Mesa-Lao (eds.). Translation in Transition: Between Cognition, Computing and Technology[C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. 208-234.
[6]	O’Brien S. 2012. Towards a dynamic quality evaluation model for translation[J]. The Journal of Specialised Translation (1):55-77.
[7]	Reiss K. 2004. Translation Criticism: The Potentials and Limitations(Trans. By Erroll F. Rhodes)[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
[8]	Seguinot C. 1990. Interpreting errors in translation[J]. Meta (1):68-73.
[9]	鲍贵、魏新俊. 2020. 二语习得研究中的常用统计方法[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社.
[10]	车明明. 2015. 应用翻译理论创新与翻译教育:思考与对策-第六届全国应用翻译研讨会综述[J]. 中国翻译(4):95-97.
[11]	戴光荣、左尚君. 2021. 翻译质量评估中语料库的运用与研究[J]. 外语教学(3):92-96.
[12]	杜琳、邬丽. 2021. 翻译专业教学的质量评估新模型:TRASILT三维模型[J]. 外语教育研究(4):47-55.
[13]	方梦之. 2003. 我国的应用翻译:定位与学术研究-2003全国应用翻译研讨会侧记[J]. 中国翻译(6):47-49.
[14]	傅敬民、王一鸣. 2017. 我国应用翻译批评话语:继承与发扬[J]. 上海翻译(6):1-6.
[15]	傅敬民、袁丽梅. 2022. 新形势下我国应用翻译研究:机遇与挑战[J]. 中国翻译(2):97-102.
[16]	何三宁. 2009. 并列还是从属:翻译质量评估与翻译批评之关系[J]. 南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版)(7):19-132.
[17]	何三宁. 2015. 翻译质量评估模式研究[M]. 北京: 中央编译出版社.
[18]	教育部高等学校翻译专业教学协作组. 2012. 高等学校翻译专业本科教学要求(试行)[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社.
[19]	李长栓. 2012. 非文学翻译理论与实践[M]. 北京: 中译出版社.
[20]	李彦、肖维青. 2020. 翻译专业教学中的应用型文本翻译质量评估:问题与对策[J]. 外语学刊(5):71-78.
[21]	梁林歆、孙迎宾. 2021. 国际应用翻译研究前沿动态及展望-基于索引期刊The Journal of Specialised Translation论文的可视化分析[J]. 上海翻译(5):23-28.
[22]	穆雷. 2006. 翻译测试及其评分问题[J]. 外语教学与研究(6):466-471.
[23]	田朋. 2020. 翻译多维质量标准MQM模型介评与启示[J]. 东方翻译(3):23-29.
[24]	王少爽. 2017. 翻译质量研究的新视角——《职业化翻译中的质量:评估与改进》述评[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报)(1):108-112.
[25]	杨志红. 2012. 翻译质量量化评估:模式、趋势与启示[J]. 外语研究(6):65-69.
[26]	郑亚亚. 2021. 专业译者翻译质量自我评估研究-以英汉翻译为例[D]. 上海: 上海外国语大学.
[27]	中国翻译协会. 2022. 中国翻译及语言服务行业发展报告2022[Z]. 北京: 中国翻译协会.

错误类型(I级指标)	错误类型(Ⅱ级指标)	定义	适用范围
准确性(Accuracy) 目标语文本未能准确反映源语文本	误增(Addition)	目标语文本中包括源语文本没有的内容	目标语文本
	误译(Mistranslation)	目标语文本的内容不能准确代表源语文本内容	目标语文本
	漏译(Omission)	目标语文本缺少源语文本中存在的内容	目标语文本
	未译(Untranslated)	源语文本中本应被翻译的内容却没有被翻译(如汉译英,目标文本是英文,却出现了未被翻译成英文的中文)	目标语文本

严重程度	定义	分值
轻微错误(minor errors)	能够发现较明显的错误,但对意义没有负面影响	1
重大错误(major errors)	能够发现较明显的错误,对意义有较大负面影响	10
严重错误(critical errors)	不仅对意义有重大影响,同时影响产品的可用性	100

译者	MQM模型数据		评分员1		评分员2		评分员3		评分员4		评分员5
译者	篇1	篇2	篇1	篇2	篇1	篇2	篇1	篇2	篇1	篇2	篇1	篇2
译者1	74.08	87.80	65	80	85	85	57	90	80	88	92	88
译者2	88.94	74.72	85	79	93	88	93	96	93	90	96	93
译者3	85.75	69.38	65	83	90	89	88	78	88	81	93	80
译者4	70.87	71.43	72	80	87	89	79	93	92	95	82	86
译者5	69.83	95.10	64	89	88	90	70	88	80	92	78	83
译者6	63.18	68.53	45	96	90	88	76	78	78	83	77	88
译者7	75.46	64.01	75	87	90	84	78	83	86	84	90	87

正态性检验
	柯尔莫戈洛夫-斯米诺夫(V)^a			夏皮洛-威尔克
	统计	自由度	显著性	统计	自由度	显著性
模型数据	0.092	30	0.200*	0.966	30	0.447
*.这是真显著性的下限。
a.里利氏显著性修正

正态性检验
	柯尔莫戈洛夫-斯米诺夫(V)^a			夏皮洛-威尔克
	统计	自由度	显著性	统计	自由度	显著性
模型数据	0.119	30	0.200*	0.946	30	0.132
*.这是真显著性的下限。
a.里利氏显著性修正

New Perspective on Translation Quality Assessment in Translation Teaching: An Industry Assessment Model

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 27

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	FENG Zhengbin, QI Beiyu. Westward Transmission of Chinese Opera:A Transknowletological Perspective [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024, 24(5): 15-24.
[2]	QI Yan. Exploring the Moderated Mediation Mechanism Between Teacher Support and Perseverance in Foreign Language Learning [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024, 24(5): 150-162.
[3]	ZHAO Guoyue. A Study of Chinese Discourse about “Nation” and “State” in Translation [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024, 24(5): 25-32.
[4]	YAO Yiyin, XU Duo. Knowledge Generation Modes, Principles and Motivations of David Hawkes’ Translation of “Yapailing” in Hongloumeng [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024, 24(5): 33-44.
[5]	ZENG Ping, FAN Wuqiu. On Fang Mengzhi’s Trichotomy Approach of “One Divided into Three” in his Translation Studies: With a Discussion on the Hot Topics and Trends of Translation Studies in China 2019—2023 [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024, 24(5): 57-68.
[6]	GUO Cong, YANG Daya, YANG Chengshu, KUANG Ming, XIAO Haipeng. A Project-based Interprofessional Approach to the Training of Language Service Providers with Medical Expertise [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024, 24(5): 80-91.
[7]	LIU Yajie. On Meaning-Construction of English Translation of Traditional Chinese Philosophical Terms from the Perspective of Conceptual History [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024, 24(4): 108-117.
[8]	GUO Hang, LI Mi. A Multimodal Approach to Translating Pragmatic Empathy in Viewpoint Shifting [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024, 24(4): 118-129.
[9]	ZHAO Hong, XU Lusheng. International Language Service for Time-Honored Brands: A Knowledge Service Perspective [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024, 24(4): 130-144.
[10]	JIN Shengxi, LI Haoyu. A Comparative Study of Translator Styles in the English Translations of The Three-Body Trilogy from the Perspective of Transknowletology [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024, 24(4): 145-157.
[11]	MO Liya. On the English Translation of Yangtao [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024, 24(4): 158-167.
[12]	XU Mingwu, NIE Wei. A Historical Exploration of National Translation Programs from the Perspective of Sci-tech Translation:Focusing on Official Translation Agencies [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024, 24(4): 16-31.
[13]	HAN Shuqin. Interpretation on the State Consciousness of Ma Jianzhong’s Conception of Translation Education [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024, 24(4): 32-39.
[14]	ZHANG Ling. The Spirit Will Last: Rememberance of Professor Liu Miqing [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024, 24(3): 13-18.
[15]	XIAO Huafeng, HUANG Yuqin. The Dissemination and Reception of Modernization Theory in China: A Transknowletological Perspective [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2024, 24(3): 19-28.

可靠性统计
克隆巴赫Alpha	项数
0.869	6

可靠性统计
克隆巴赫Alpha	项数
0.850	6