Application value of transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with magnetic resonance imaging in T staging and treatment decision-making for middle and low rectal cancer

doi:10.16150/j.1671-2870.2025.03.008

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To explore the application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in T staging of middle and low rectal cancer, providing an accurate basis for multidisciplinary treatment (MDT). Method AA retrospective analysis was conducted on the case data of 80 consecutive patients with middle and low rectal cancer admitted to the hospital from April 2023 to February 2025. All patients underwent transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), CEUS, and 3.0T MRI examinations within one week before biopsy or surgery. Using postoperative pathological results as the gold standard, the diagnostic performance of single and combined examinations in diagno-sing T staging of low rectal cancer was calculated separately. Result The combined examination for T₁ rectal cancer showed a sensitivity of 87.5%, specificity of 99%, positive predictive value of 99.9%, and negative predictive value of 96.7%. For T₂ rectal cancer, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 91.3%, 96.3%, 91.3%, and 96.3%, respectively. For T₃ rectal cancer, these values were 93.5%, 97.8%, 96.7%, and 95.7%, respectively. For T₄rectal cancer, these values were 90%, 98.5%, 90%, and 98.5%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of the combined examination for T₁-T₄ rectal cancer was 97.5%, 97.5%, 96.25%, and 98.7%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of CEUS examination alone for T₁-T₄stages was 87.5%, 86.96%, 80.65%, and 80%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of MRI examination alone for T₁-T₄ stages was 81.25%, 78.26%, 90.32%, and 90%, respectively. The accuracy of the combined examination was significantly higher than that of CEUS or MRI examination alone (P<0.05). The consistency between the combined examination and pathological staging was good (Kappa value=0.877, P<0.05). After CEUS combined with MRI examination, the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve of the diagnostic model rose to 0.85, significantly exceeding that of single examination methods(CEUS AUC=0.75, MRI AUC=0.758). Additionally, it was found that T₁-T₂ rectal cancer showed varying degrees of uniform enhancement on CEUS, and the specificity of CEUS combined with MRI in diagnosing T₁-T₂ rectal cancer reached over 96.3%. The low enhancement observed on CEUS in the portal phase achieved a high specificity of 95.5% for diagnosing T₃ and higher-stage tumors. Conclusion CEUS combined with MRI has significant advantages in the diagnosis of T staging of rectal cancer, especially for T₁ and T₂ stages, which have notable superiority over single examination. The accuracy of the combined examination can reach 97.5% and 97.5%, and the specificity can reach 99% and 96.3%, respectively, making it useful for ruling out non-neoplastic lesions.

Key words: Multimodal imaging, Transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound, Magnetic resonance imaging, Rectal cancer T staging, Surgical treatment

CLC Number:

ZHAO Ran, ZHAN Weiwei, LI Cheng, TANG Hailang, BO Yulian, LIU Kun. Application value of transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with magnetic resonance imaging in T staging and treatment decision-making for middle and low rectal cancer[J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2025, 24(03): 293-300.

Figures/Tables 7

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Table 4

References 26

[1]	National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN guidelines® insights:rectal cancer,version 3.2024[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2024, 22(6):366-375.
[2]	SIEGEL R L, MILLER K D, JEMAL A. Cancer statistics, 2020[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2020, 70(1):7-30.
[3]	中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组, 中华医学会外科学分会结直肠外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会结直肠外科专家工作组, 等. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术操作指南(2023版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2024, 23(1):10-22.
	Laparoscopic & Endoscopic Surgery Group, Branch of Surgery, Chinese Medical Association, Colorectal Surgery Group, Branch of Surgery, Chinese Medical Association, Chinese Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Chinese Medical Doctor Association, et al. Guideline for operative procedure of laparoscopic radical surgery for colorectal cancer (2023 edition)[J]. Chin J Dig Surg, 2024, 23(1): 10-22.
[4]	EDGE S B, BYRD D R, COMPTON C C, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual[M]. 7th ed. New York: Springer, 2010.
[5]	SARGENT D J, MARSON R P, MONGA J, et al. Preope-rative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: Long-term results of RTOG 98-11 trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2012, 30(13):1491-1497.
[6]	van HAGEN P, HULSHOF M C, van LANSCHOT J J, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: A systematic review[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2012, 13(6):e270-e277.
[7]	MAAS M, BEETS-TAN R, LAMBIN P, et al. Preoperative MRI in rectal cancer: A systematic review[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2010, 11(9):817-826.
[8]	CUI X W, TANG Y L, LIANG P, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for colorectal cancer diagnosis: A meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2018,108:142-150.
[9]	ZHANG X, LIANG P, WANG Y, et al. Diagnostic values of 3D transrectal ultrasound and MRI in T substaging of rectal cancer[J]. Abdom Radiol, 2019, 44(10):3616-3624.
[10]	KANG X, ZHANG X, LIANG P, et al. Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography vs MRI in rectal cancer staging[J]. Eur Radiol, 2018, 28(11):4655-4663.
[11]	SIDDIQUI F, BROWN G, TEKKIS P, et al. Multidisciplinary team management of rectal cancer:A systematic review[J]. Br J Surg, 2017, 104(13):1732-1743.
[12]	多中心直肠癌真实世界数据库建设与数据质量控制策略[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2025, 24(1):77-81.
	Multicenter rectal cancer real-world database construction and data quality control strategies[J]. J Chin Dig Surg, 2025, 24(1):77-81.
[13]	BROWN G, SIDDIQUI F, TEKKIS P, et al. Impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on colorectal cancer management[J]. Clin Oncol, 2018, 30(11):697-707.
[14]	MAAS M, BEETS-TAN R, LAMBIN P, et al. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging of rectal cancer:a systematic review[J]. Lancet Oncology, 2010, 11(9):817-826.
[15]	舒国亮, 肖耀成, 唐贤朋, 等. 腔内超声及磁共振对局部进展期直肠癌诊断准确性的研究[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(22):2850-2854.
	SHU G L, XIAO Y C, TANG X P, et al. Study on diagnostic accuracy of intracavitary ultrasound and MRI for locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. J Pract Med, 2022, 38(22):2850-2854.
[16]	刘丽娟, 袁倩, 徐晓红, 等. 超声双重造影在结直肠癌诊断及分期评估中的应用进展[J]. 山东医药, 2024, 64(1):111-114.
	LIU L J, YUAN Q, XU X H, et al. Application progress of dual-contrast ultrasound in diagnosis and staging of colorectal cancer[J]. Shandong Med J, 2024, 64(1):111-114.
[17]	李陶, 任安平, 程伟, 等. 双平面经直肠腔内超声联合超微血流成像在中低位直肠癌术前T分期中的应用价值[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2023, 38(9):662-668.
	LI T, REN A P, CHENG W, et al. Value of dual-plane transrectal ultrasound with microflow imaging in preope-rative T staging of mid-low rectal cancer[J]. Chin J Gen Surg, 2023, 38(9):662-668.
[18]	郭碧萍. 直肠超声双重造影与介入活检检查对直肠癌分型及TN分期的评估[J]. 医学研究杂志, 2022, 51(8):57-60.
	GUO B P. Evaluation of rectal cancer classification and TN staging by dual-contrast rectal ultrasound and biopsy[J]. J Med Res, 2022, 51(8):57-60.
[19]	李观远. 经直肠超声造影参数与直肠癌患者临床病理特征及生存预后的相关性[J]. 生命科学仪器, 2023, 21(3):97-100.
	LI G Y. Correlation between parameters of transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound and clinical pathological characteristics in rectal cancer[J]. Life Sci Instrum, 2023, 21(3):97-100.
[20]	邓旦, 李茜, 孙丽娟. 术前经直肠三维超声及盆腔MRI检查在中低位直肠癌TN分期评估中的应用[J]. 山东医药, 2018, 58(27):75-78.
	DENG D, LI Q, SUN L J. Application of preoperative 3D transrectal ultrasound and pelvic MRI in TN staging of mid-low rectal cancer[J]. Shandong Med J, 2018, 58(27):75-78.
[21]	宋天彬, 卢洁. 磁共振扩散加权成像在直肠癌新辅助放化疗中的应用价值[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2017, 8(2-3):100-105.
	SONG T B, LU J. Application value of diffusion-weighted MRI in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer[J]. Med J Peking Union Med Coll, 2017, 8(2-3):100-105.
[22]	赵任, 蒋奕枚. 直肠癌外科手术治疗进展[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2016, 21(6):468-471.
	ZHAO R, JIANG Y M. Progress in surgical treatment of rectal cancer[J]. J Surg Theory Pract, 2016, 21(6):468-471.
[23]	孙跃明, 张冬生. 重视结直肠癌外科手术的进步[J]. 中国肿瘤外科杂志, 2022, 4(6):521-526.
	SUN Y M, ZHANG D S. Advances in colorectal cancer surgery[J]. Chin J Surg Oncol, 2022, 14(6):521-526.
[24]	李珂璇, 肖体先, 汪晓东, 等. 中低位直肠癌初诊及新辅助治疗后评估完成度分析:全国多中心真实世界研究[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2025, 24(1): 113-119.
	LI K X, XIAO T X, WANG X D, et al. Analysis of completion rate of tumor evaluation at initial assessment and after neoadjuvant therapy for mid and low rectal cancer : a national multicenter real-world study[J]. Chin J Dig Surg, 2025, 24(1):113-119.
[25]	马韬, 冯波. 局部进展期直肠癌全程新辅助治疗的发展与挑战[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2023, 43(7):744-751.
	MA T, FENG B. Development and challenges of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. Chin J Pract Surg, 2023, 43(7):744-751.
[26]	徐远, 曲智锋, 原翔. Ⅲb期直肠癌术前短程放疗与术前长程放疗分别联合化疗疗效的随机对照研究[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2021, 29(11):1923-1928.
	XU Y, QU Z F, YUAN X. Randomized controlled study of preoperative short-course vs long-course radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy for stage Ⅲb rectal cancer[J]. Mod Oncol, 2021, 29(11):1923-1928.

Pathologic staging	Inspection method	Sensitivity	Specificity	Positive predictive value	Negative predictive value
T₁	CEUS MRI Joint inspection	0.875 0.813 0.875	0.981 0.990 0.990	0.933 0.999 0.999	0.964 0.948 0.967
T₂	CEUS MRI Joint inspection	0.870 0.783 0.913	0.959 0.926 0.963	0.909 0.818 0.913	0.940 0.909 0.963
T₃	CEUS MRI Joint inspection	0.806 0.903 0.935	0.955 0.952 0.978	0.926 0.933 0.967	0.875 0.930 0.957
T₄	CEUS MRI Joint inspection	0.800 0.900 0.900	0.983 0.983 0.985	0.889 0.900 0.900	0.967 0.983 0.985